1,687 exam re-takers were not cheaters
1,687 exam re-takers were not cheaters
- by JARIUS BONDOC (Gotcha Column)
For letting misleading reports pass, the PRC has soiled the 1,687 passers whom the Court slated for retake. Contrary to sweeping remarks of interloping politicos like Sen. Panfilo Lacson, the 1,687 never cheated.
Hey wait, not so fast. Despite Friday’s Court of Appeals ruling on the nursing exam fraud, the problem is not over. Responsibility shirkers at the Professional Regulation Commission cannot just sweep it under the rug by rushing to swear in all but 1,687 exam passers.
Three reasons compel the PRC to prudence. One, as Malacañan cautions, some parties might still contest the ruling. Two, contrary to the PRC’s publicized interpretation, the Court did not rule to swear in all 17,000 passers nationwide, but only those who clearly did not benefit from leakage of questionnaires. Three, while the Court ruled on the legal aspect of the to-do, the PRC has yet to face the larger issue: the taint on Filipino nurses and professional licensing.
On the first point, events already have overtaken the PRC. The Santo Tomas University nursing faculty and students, along with a nurses’ group, filed a motion Monday to reverse the Court ruling. In their mind, although unsupported by evidence heaped by the NBI, the cheating was nationwide, so the exam retake must also be nationwide. Litigants usually have 15 days to challenge a court ruling, so the earliest the PRC may swear in any passer, counting from Friday if nobody contests the ruling, is Oct. 28.
PRC chair Leonor Rosero should know that. In Senate hearings she constantly stressed that she consults her lawyers for her every move. Last Monday hundreds of anxious passers crowded into the PRC main office to be sworn in, but were told that Malacañan had stopped the rites. Bitterly disappointed they blamed everyone except the PRC that had led them on.
The misleading began with the false construal that the Court granted the PRC’s wish to swear in all 17,000 passers. That is farthest from the truth. What the Court did was let the PRC administer the nurses’ oath on passers who appear to not have benefited from the leakage. These obviously are passers from five of seven test sites; the NBI identified only Manila and Baguio to have been marred by fraud.
Impliedly the passers from Manila and Baguio must retake the exam. It need not be that messy, though. If the PRC does its job instead of taking the path of least resistance, it can narrow down further the number of re-takers. Not arbitrarily all examinees from Manila and Baguio would be compelled to retake, but only those who reviewed at three leaky centers – Inress, Gapuz and Pentagon. Plus, of course, attendees at a "final session" of seven schools at a Manila cinema house during which the questions were divulged.
For letting misleading reports pass, the PRC has soiled the 1,687 passers whom the Court slated for retake. Contrary to sweeping remarks of interloping politicos like Sen. Panfilo Lacson, the 1,687 never cheated. They were only so grouped because the PRC, after at first denying leaks of Tests 3 and 5, tried to plug it months later by re-computing the scores. The PRC scrapped 20 questions from Test 3 and added weight to the remaining 80; it also junked 90 questions from Test 5 and gave away any correct answer to remaining 10 as bonus to the final scores. As a result, 1,687 examinees who originally had flunked suddenly made the grade. So if they benefited from anything, it’s not from the leakage but the PRC’s re-computation – an act now branded as illegal by the Commission on Filipinos Overseas.
CFO chairman Dante Ang intervened in the crisis because of its effect on the country’s image. For a year he had been working on the holding in Manila of the annual US nursing licensure exams. That way, Filipino nurses seeking greener pastures would not have to fly to Tokyo or Hong Kong to take a shot at it. The leakage caught world attention. The PRC made it worse by first hiding it and then re-computing the scores in violation of the Nursing Profession Code. The brouhaha not only has spoiled the chances of Manila as an exam site. It also has scared local hospitals from hiring any of the June examinees.
Repairing a damaged reputation can be long and arduous. PRC chair Rosero’s aim, however, is to just get the oath-taking over and done with. In August, when the Court was about to take jurisdiction over the case, she rushed the swear-in of 6,000 of the 17,000 passers. Severely criticized for pre-empting the judiciary, she just shrugged. To date, however, only 2,000 of the 6,000 have been issued licenses because that it how slow the PRC is with its normal duties. But when asked if the NBI findings of fraud in Manila and Baguio means the PRC will have to repossess the licenses of those issued from those sites, Rosero turned adamant. No way may the PRC or even Malacañan revoke licenses, for what’s done is done. This is reminiscent of Teddy Roosevelt sending the US Navy on a saber-rattling expedition halfway across the globe without Congress consent, and then demanding that legislators appropriate money for the return trip lest the Great White Fleet be stranded far from American shores.
- by JARIUS BONDOC (Gotcha Column)
For letting misleading reports pass, the PRC has soiled the 1,687 passers whom the Court slated for retake. Contrary to sweeping remarks of interloping politicos like Sen. Panfilo Lacson, the 1,687 never cheated.
Hey wait, not so fast. Despite Friday’s Court of Appeals ruling on the nursing exam fraud, the problem is not over. Responsibility shirkers at the Professional Regulation Commission cannot just sweep it under the rug by rushing to swear in all but 1,687 exam passers.
Three reasons compel the PRC to prudence. One, as Malacañan cautions, some parties might still contest the ruling. Two, contrary to the PRC’s publicized interpretation, the Court did not rule to swear in all 17,000 passers nationwide, but only those who clearly did not benefit from leakage of questionnaires. Three, while the Court ruled on the legal aspect of the to-do, the PRC has yet to face the larger issue: the taint on Filipino nurses and professional licensing.
On the first point, events already have overtaken the PRC. The Santo Tomas University nursing faculty and students, along with a nurses’ group, filed a motion Monday to reverse the Court ruling. In their mind, although unsupported by evidence heaped by the NBI, the cheating was nationwide, so the exam retake must also be nationwide. Litigants usually have 15 days to challenge a court ruling, so the earliest the PRC may swear in any passer, counting from Friday if nobody contests the ruling, is Oct. 28.
PRC chair Leonor Rosero should know that. In Senate hearings she constantly stressed that she consults her lawyers for her every move. Last Monday hundreds of anxious passers crowded into the PRC main office to be sworn in, but were told that Malacañan had stopped the rites. Bitterly disappointed they blamed everyone except the PRC that had led them on.
The misleading began with the false construal that the Court granted the PRC’s wish to swear in all 17,000 passers. That is farthest from the truth. What the Court did was let the PRC administer the nurses’ oath on passers who appear to not have benefited from the leakage. These obviously are passers from five of seven test sites; the NBI identified only Manila and Baguio to have been marred by fraud.
Impliedly the passers from Manila and Baguio must retake the exam. It need not be that messy, though. If the PRC does its job instead of taking the path of least resistance, it can narrow down further the number of re-takers. Not arbitrarily all examinees from Manila and Baguio would be compelled to retake, but only those who reviewed at three leaky centers – Inress, Gapuz and Pentagon. Plus, of course, attendees at a "final session" of seven schools at a Manila cinema house during which the questions were divulged.
For letting misleading reports pass, the PRC has soiled the 1,687 passers whom the Court slated for retake. Contrary to sweeping remarks of interloping politicos like Sen. Panfilo Lacson, the 1,687 never cheated. They were only so grouped because the PRC, after at first denying leaks of Tests 3 and 5, tried to plug it months later by re-computing the scores. The PRC scrapped 20 questions from Test 3 and added weight to the remaining 80; it also junked 90 questions from Test 5 and gave away any correct answer to remaining 10 as bonus to the final scores. As a result, 1,687 examinees who originally had flunked suddenly made the grade. So if they benefited from anything, it’s not from the leakage but the PRC’s re-computation – an act now branded as illegal by the Commission on Filipinos Overseas.
CFO chairman Dante Ang intervened in the crisis because of its effect on the country’s image. For a year he had been working on the holding in Manila of the annual US nursing licensure exams. That way, Filipino nurses seeking greener pastures would not have to fly to Tokyo or Hong Kong to take a shot at it. The leakage caught world attention. The PRC made it worse by first hiding it and then re-computing the scores in violation of the Nursing Profession Code. The brouhaha not only has spoiled the chances of Manila as an exam site. It also has scared local hospitals from hiring any of the June examinees.
Repairing a damaged reputation can be long and arduous. PRC chair Rosero’s aim, however, is to just get the oath-taking over and done with. In August, when the Court was about to take jurisdiction over the case, she rushed the swear-in of 6,000 of the 17,000 passers. Severely criticized for pre-empting the judiciary, she just shrugged. To date, however, only 2,000 of the 6,000 have been issued licenses because that it how slow the PRC is with its normal duties. But when asked if the NBI findings of fraud in Manila and Baguio means the PRC will have to repossess the licenses of those issued from those sites, Rosero turned adamant. No way may the PRC or even Malacañan revoke licenses, for what’s done is done. This is reminiscent of Teddy Roosevelt sending the US Navy on a saber-rattling expedition halfway across the globe without Congress consent, and then demanding that legislators appropriate money for the return trip lest the Great White Fleet be stranded far from American shores.
To my understanding the 1,687 that are supposed to re-take test III and V were never branded as cheaters. They are the ones that actually failed but passed because of the recomputation done by the PRC after it nullified 20 and 90 questions of test III and V respectively. Now that the CA's ruling nullified PRC Resolution 31, PRC has to obey the courts order and go back to the original list of passers. I emphatize with those whose names appeared in the list because they have been declared as "passers" but now they have to retake part of the exam. But then again, if you see it with an open mind, it will come out that it's a blessing in disguise because in reality they should have failed but now they are just made to re-take part of the exam and will have a high chance of passing it.
Posted by
Anonymous |
11:14 AM
The question is why is Gloria afraid of rosero, is it because they are of the same feather....they are both good in sweeping their faults under the rug
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:07 PM
Not much effect. This is just another commentary from someone outside the nursing profession. So easy fo these people to write stuff as if they know everything, the pros and cons of the issue.
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:32 PM
this is the same 'misleading' commentary...
- the 1,687 were the beneficiary of 'recomputation' done by PRC.
- the oath taking is for all board passers... including manila & baguio passers.
- the only time they won't be able to take oath is if the NBI found them guilty of attending & benefitting from the 'final coaching' of 3 review centers in question...
guys, INQUIRER IS SO BIASED IN THEIR REPORTING....
why don't you TRY PHILIPPINE STAR instead!
Posted by
Anonymous |
2:00 PM
this is the same 'misleading' commentary...
- the 1,687 were the beneficiary of 'recomputation' done by PRC. they failed before recomputation but passed after the recomputation... they are not CHEATERS!
- the oath taking is for all board passers... including manila & baguio passers.
- the only time they won't be able to take oath is if the NBI found them guilty of attending and benefitting the from the 'final coaching' (w/ leakage) of 3 review centers in question' ...
guys, PHIL DAILY INQUIRER IS SO BIASED IN THEIR REPORTING... the reporters always include 'personal innuendos' that is SO MISLEADING TO THE PUBLIC!!! SO MUCH LIKE MANILA TIMES...
why don't you TRY PHILIPPINE STAR instead! they are 'MORE OBJECTIVE' in their reporting!
Posted by
Anonymous |
2:11 PM
Phil Daily Inquirer editors & field reporters are so obviously clinging for All Board passers to RETAKE the whole exam, so as Manila times & ABS-CBN... they want to influence the public that a 'retake' will remove the tainted image created by those people who are in position but did nothing in their power to uphold the integrity
of nursing profession in the past... they want to sacrifice the 2006 board passers future to salvage them from disgrace of their own making...
We, BOARD PASSERS will not allow to be used and abused in this manner!!!
WE EARN THAT NURSING DEGREE & RN LICENSE!!! AND WE WANT IT NOW!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
2:13 PM
Here we go again. The demolitionists are back! Board passers, the struggle is not over.Back to the trenches!Nobody says that the 1,687 are cheaters but this try to stir and mislead a lot of people just to reintroduce their rejected arguments.Ang lakas naman ng UST sa media. PDI and ABS CBN are the most relentless!Understandable. Lot of UST media men in these two enterprises. But not all of them as bias.
Here is another one."Two, contrary to the PRC’s publicized interpretation, the Court did not rule to swear in all 17,000 passers nationwide, but only those who clearly did not benefit from leakage of questionnaires." Halata naman 'to. "Clearly" ay sarili lang niya. What is clear is all can take their oath but those who attended the last briefing maybe hel liable and their registration can be revoke after they are proven to cheat. The issue is did they cheat?Not benefit because there is no crime of benefit. That is why even Mr. anraring and CA says difficult and impractical because it is so if you have to prove that they cheated. Ewan, iba yatang decision ang nabasa nito. Sabi niya"The misleading began with the false construal that the Court granted the PRC’s wish to swear in all 17,000 passers. That is farthest from the truth. What the Court did was let the PRC administer the nurses’ oath on passers who appear to not have benefited from the leakage. These obviously are passers from five of seven test sites; the NBI identified only Manila and Baguio to have been marred by fraud." Di ba sabi lahat mag oath pero yong mga umattend ng last briefing iimbestigahan at yong licensya nila aalisin. But it has to be proven that they cheated. 'Will this people apologize or recompense the board passers later when they are proven arong for the misleading comments they are making. Sayang lang ang mga broadsheets sa kanila. Pero dami talaga. Konting konti lang sa media ang unbiased o kumakampisa board passers.
Posted by
Anonymous |
2:27 PM
NOT JUST PHIL INQUIRER BUT ABS-CBN IS SOOOO PRO-RETAKE...
Posted by
Anonymous |
2:29 PM
ANO PA BA IBABALITA SA ANTI RETAKE?? NA CORRUPT UNG KUMAKAMPI SA INYO??? SAN KAYA DINALA PINAMBAYAD NYO SA OATH TAKING?? NA KANINO KAYA YUNG PERA?? AHH ALAM KO NA.. SA EX BON PALA.. UN AUDITED AND WALANG RECEIPT UN DBA?? ANO PA BA?? NA DI KAYO NANDAYA.. EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT..NA UNG SUM OF THE RETAKERS E DI NAKINABANG SA LEAKAGE KC DI NAMAN NAGREVIEW SA 3 REVIEW CENTERS NA YUN.. ALAM NA NAMING LAHAT YUN EH.(ITS JUST MALI LANG NAMAN COMPUTATION ANG GINAMIT NI ROSERO AND NILOKO NYA UNG MADLANG PIPOL.. D BALE MATUTUWA NA KAYO NEXT TIME SA BALITA.. NA BAKA NEXT TIME, NAKALAGAY SA BANNER STORY PRC BINOMBA.. SANA NAMAN NDI MANGYARI YUN..
Posted by
Anonymous |
4:19 PM
guys, if you read PHIL STAR last Saturday, 14 Oct ANG LAYO NG CONTENT & CONTEXT nya, objectively speaking, sa content & news ng Phil Daily Inquirer! PUnong-puno ng 'personal insinuations' ang Phil Daily Inquirer. And incorrect reporting... So irresponsible... so much like Tadle & UST flunkers!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:05 PM
hoy anonymous 4:19PM
ano naman masasabi mo sa STAR WITNESS NG UST NA SI DENNIS BAUTISTA, NA NAGREVIEW SA 3 REVIEW CENTERS (PENTAGON, INRESS, GAPUZ)na sinasabi nyang may LEAKAGES DAW KUNO???
3 SOURCE NG LEAKAGES NA YUN, E BAKIT DI PA DIN SYA PUMASA????
SO KUNG PAPATULAN NAMIN ANG 'LOGIC & REASONING' NINYO...
IT'S EITHER SAKSAKAN SYA NG BOBO OR WALANG LEAKAGES...
E MUKANG BILIB NA BILIB KAY DENNIS BAUTISTA ANG UST AT MEDIA... SO IBIG SABIHIN MATALINO SYA PERO DI TOTOO ANG LEAKAGES!
KASI KUNG MAY LEAKAGE, SA DAMI NG LEAKAGES NA YUN (COMING FROM 3 REVIEW CENTERS) E DAPAT PUMASA NA SYA!!!
PAKI- EXPLAIN HANE!!!
KUNG DI MO MA-EXPLAIN ITO LANG ANG MASASABI KO SAYO...
KAILANGAN MONG IDAGDAG ANG 'LOGIC & REASONING' SA REREVIEHIN NYO FOR DEC! & U DESERVE A RETAKE FOR THAT! SIMPLE LANG DI PA MAINTINDIHAN... SOBRANG PASAWAY NA KAYO, HA!
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:15 PM
i hope that those who reviewed in the in the 3 review centers who allegedly distributed leaks will be collectively branded as cheaters because not all who attended the final coaching in those review centers benefited from the leak. I should know because i attended the final coaching of Gapuz and i didnt get any leak. In fact i think that the final coaching was useless since the topics discussed didnt came out of the actual exam. That is the truth. Now, for those who got the leak i dont know how and when they got it. I hope that you will not punish those who attended those review centers because i chose to attend Gapuz not cuz of the leak but cuz of the knowledge i can get. And im proud to say that i passed without the leakage. NOt all who reviewed in Gapuz, Inress and Pentagon are cheaters!! YOu have to prove a person's guilt first. Wag nyo idamay lahat! Wag kayo mapanghusga at wag nyo parusahan ang di dapat parusahan!
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:19 PM
just a correction for a typo error..what i mean to say is those who reviewed in those 3 review centers should not be collectively branded as cheaters. Isa isahin ninyo i-prove ang lahat ng nag review dun kung guilty o hindi. Wag nyo lahatin. Patunayan nyo with evidence each student who reviewed in those 3 review centers wheter they are guilty or not.
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:24 PM
USAPAN NA ITO NG MGA PASADO SA 2006 BOARD EXAM, HINDI NG MGA BUMAGSAK...
USAPAN NA ITO NG ‘DELAYED EXECUTION NG CA ORDER FOR OATHTAKING OF 17,000 BOARD PASSERS!
NA PARA LANG HA... PARA LANG... MA-ACCOMMODATE ANG REQUEST NG KAMAHAL MAHALANG UNIVERSITY OF STO. TOMAS!!!#$@*** AY SOBRANG BINABALE-WALA ANG 17,000 BOARD PASSERS!
YUNG 1,687 NA FOR RETAKE NGAYON AY PASADO NA SANA SILANG LAHAT KUNG DI DAHIL SA TRO AT KASELFISHAN NG UST… ANG DAPAT NA SISIHIN DITO AY UST… KUNG PRC ANG TATANUNGIN NINYO, KULANG NA LANG NA IPASA KAYONG LAHAT… HINDI GANUN KASAMA ANG SILA MAM ROSERO, KAHIT SILA MAM OCTAVIANO… GUSTO NGA NILA NA I-GIVE AWAY NA SANA YUNG TEST 5, PARA MORE THAN 60% ANG PUMASA…PERO DAHIL SA KATALINUHAN NI ATTY YANGOT KINUMBINSE NYA ANG 90 BAGUIO WHISTLE BLOWERS NA MAG-COMPLAINT PARA SYA AY MAKILALA NG MADLA!!!
KUNG PUROS SARILI LANG NINYO ANG INYONG IISIPIN, PARE-PAREHAS TAYONG SA KANKUNGAN PUPULUTIN… AT PATULOY NA GAGAMITIN NG MEDIA, AT MGA PULITIKO!!! HOY GISING!!!
UTANG NA LOOB…
LEAKAGE FREE NA ANG NLE, BAGO PA I-RELEASE NG PRC ANG RESULT NG EXAM NUONG 19 JULY 2006!!!
MGA ‘IMBECILE’ LANG ANG DI MAKAKAINTINDI NITO!!! ANO BAH! @#$%*
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:28 PM
AT HUWAG NINYONG KALIMUTAN YUNG OWNERS NG 3 REVIEW CENTERS! SILA ANG DAPAT NA MANAGOT SA LAHAT NG KAGULUHANG ITO!!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:47 PM
ANG PROBLEM SA 1687 N MAG RERETAKE EH ANG IBA NA ISSUEHAN NA NG LICENSE. GANUN NA LANG BA YUN NA BASTA NA LANG BABAWIIN AT SASABIHIN NA ICACANCEL NILA LICENSE KASI NAG DELIBERATE DAW ANG PRC NG MGA GRADES, BAKIT IN THE FIRST PLACE NAWAWALA NA YUNG TALAGANG ISSUE NG MGA NAG BENIFIT SA LEAKAGE,,,, HAY KAWAWA NMAN TALAGA ANG PILIPINAS NABUBUHAY NA LNG SA DAGDAG BAWAS KAHIT MA PA ELECTION O MAPA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING.. MAY BATAS BA NA PWEDENG ICANCEL ANG ISANG LICENSE DAHIL SA DINAGDAGAN LANG DAW ANG SCORE NG TALAGANG DI NKAPASA..BKIT KASI NILA DINAGDAGAN WHERE IN WLA NMAN NAG SASABING DAGDAGAN NILA ANG SCORE....TAPOS NGYUN BABAWASAN NILA AT ICACANCEL NILA YUNG LICENSE N BINIGAY NILA....HAY NAKU PRC AT PHIL GOVERNMENT KAWAWA TALAGA MGA NASASAKUPAN NYO.BWISIT KAYO.
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:58 PM
Sa mga flunkers na complainants, mahiya naman kayo. Gusto nyo 17,000 passers mag-retake dahil incompetent, eh kayo me leakage na flunkers pa, di kayo ang incompetent, hindi sila. And you are below the level of the 17,000 passers dahil sila pumasa, kayo hindi. Yung nagawa nila, di nyo nagawa. Kaya ang me kailangan ng retake, kayo lang, hindi sila.
Dahil sa ginawa ninyo, ang mga hospitals, baka kayo ang hindi i-hire dahil argulyoso kayo, ang kakapal ng mukha nyo, at palipit kayong mag-isip. Baka bandang huli, i-complain at ipahamak pa nyo ang boss nyo sa hospital! You have that making--you find what is wrong in others but not in yourselves--yet you are worse!
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:04 PM
OF COURSE THE 1,687 NURSES WHO WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE LIST OF PASSERS ARE NOT CHEATERS. THEY ONLY FAILED. SA UNA PA LANG DAPAT HINDI MUNA TALAGA NI-RELEASE NG PRC ANG RESULTA, DAGDAG PASAKIT AT KAHIHIYAN PARA SA MGA NASAMA SA LISTAHAN NAYUN ANG NANGYARI SA KANILA, WE BATCH 2006 NURSES HAVE BEEN TAGGED AS CHEATERS BY SOME HEARTLESS PEOPLE TAPOS, YUNG IBANG NURSES NA NAKASAMA SA LIST NA YUN AY MABABAWIAN PA NG LISENSYA KC KELANGAN UMULIT NG EXAM, HAY ANO BA TALAGA??? PARA TAYONG PINAGLALARUAN DITO, MAKAKAPAGTRABAHO PA KAYA TAYO? SANA PAG NAGINVESTIGATE ANG NBI MAGING FAIR DIN SILA, KASI ACTUALLY HINDI NAMAN LAHAT NG GALING SA GAPUZ OR PENTA AY BENEFICIARIES NG LEAKAGE. LORD PLEASE HELP US!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:07 PM
Back to original computation na ang scores sa Test 1 to 5 sa NLE exam. so paano yan, hindi na "leakage free" ang scores ngayon?!
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:07 PM
Eto pa ang sanggahin ng pro-retake:
Primero,42,000 ang kumuha at 25,000 ang hindi nakapasa.Bakit si Dennis Bautista lang ang witness o may 19 pa? Kung widespread napakatanga ba p natatakot ba yong libo libong kumuha ng exam. Ang totoo pakulo lang ng review center yong leak at tops. Tanga ba sila na sasabihin sa briefing na sigurado 'yon. Kaya hanggang ngayon yong mga bumagsak sa review center hindi sila makapagwitness. Nalaman lang ng reviewees pagkatapos ng exam sa final briefing na sa kahon kahon na review materials kahalo na dyan yong mga leak questions wala pa ring silbi. Kahit na kakasuhan nila ang mga review centers mahirap nila mapatunayan dahil draft lang ito. Yong BON examinees malinaw kapabayaan at kung may bayad ay karagdagang ebidensya. Yong review centers ang daming palusot. Napulot,nafax, naxerox at etc. etc.Kailangan makuha nila evidence trail(fingerprints etc, reibo, audio, video) mula sa BON papunta sa review centers. Kaya ano sabi bg NBI."Mahirap at impraktikal". Pinapahirap lang at pinatatagal dahil kahiyaan na. Pasong paso na pati marami sa media. Kaya ang NBI sabi pa oath nyo na 'yan at kasuhan nyo isaisa para matanggal ang lisensya ng mapatunayan nyo na nandaya.
2.Segundo- Si D.Bautista at R.Tadle pahiyang pahiya na kahit kapit na sa samurai. Sige na lang.
Ang gawin na lang nilang dalawa hakutin nila yong libo libong bumagsak at panumpain nila na nakakita sila ng leakage. Yun!Baka sakaling balikan ng NBI. Pero kung si D.Bautista lang ang witness kahit libolibo pang medya at tagagatong sa likod nya walang mangyayari. Masakit ang batas!!!Ganun talaga!!!Wala tayong magawa. Kaya kahit si ERAP at Marcos nasipa dahil sa dami ng tao.Kaya mga pro retake magpeople power na lang kayo. Anti retake 17000 kadami!!Kaya nyo yan!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:10 PM
Ang nakakapagtaka lang dito bihirang bihira ang bumagsak na kumakalaban sa anti retake. Karamihan UST at grupo lang nila.Yong sinasabi na passers na pro retake mabilang mo naman sa kamay yong magreretake ng mabigyan ng option.
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:13 PM
teka, yung 1687 na for retake... test 3 & 5 lang naman ang ire-retake nila.
test 3 & 5 lang kailangan nilang ipasa. kesa naman yung buong exam ang ulitin nila... hellar!
diba mas fair yun for them coz bagsak naman talaga sila nung umpisa pa lang... haller!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:14 PM
at TEKA ULIT, yung 1,687 for RETAKE di naman ibig sabihin ng RETAKE e flunkers na kayo... iba pa pa yung flunkers noh!
hindi issue kung may license na kyo or hindi... kung maipasa ninyo yung test 3 & 5, di na kailangan bawiin yung mga license ninyo...
kung bumagsak lang kayo...
utang na loob...huwag ninyong lituhin ang mga sarili at buhay ninyo!
pasalamat pa nga kayo at test 3 & 5 lang ang ire-retake... originally for retake of whole exam ang 1,687 na ito na affected ng 'recomputation'... that's TRUTH!
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:22 PM
at TEKA ULIT, yung 1,687 for RETAKE di naman ibig sabihin ng RETAKE e flunkers na kayo... iba pa yung 'flunkers' noh! (si brant ng UST yun, flunker yun. nyehehe!)
hindi issue kung may license na kyo or wala... kung maipasa ninyo yung test 3 & 5, di na kailangan bawiin yung mga license ninyo...
kung bumagsak lang kayo...
utang na loob...huwag ninyong lituhin ang mga sarili at buhay ninyo!
pasalamat pa nga kayo at test 3 & 5 lang ang ire-retake... originally for retake of whole exam ang 1,687 na ito na affected ng 'recomputation'... that's TRUTH! :P
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:28 PM
Ang hirap kasi sa retake, yung mga tunggak na gustong magpa-retake ng test 3 ay for 100 questions ang retake, gayung ang may leakage ay 20 questions lang. So bakit nila i-nullify yung 80 clean questions? Dapat i-maintain ito at ang retake ay for 20 questions lang. This is the fair approach, but the "gunggongs" are not doing it this way, that is why me resistance--UNFAIR ang treatment sa retakers!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
9:34 PM
"guys, PHIL DAILY INQUIRER IS SO BIASED IN THEIR REPORTING... the reporters always include 'personal innuendos' that is SO MISLEADING TO THE PUBLIC!!! SO MUCH LIKE MANILA TIMES..."
kasi po DANTE ANG owns The Manila Times...
Posted by
Anonymous |
11:01 PM
Bakit naman bibigyan ang 1687 ang retake, bagsak na sila in the first place, like everyone else who flunked the exam, now they only take test 3 and 5 which is unfair, kami lahat ang flunker will have to take all the exam again... ano ba yan CA hindi nila alam kung ano yon justice, injustice ang decision nila...
Posted by
Anonymous |
11:20 PM
Please understand carefully that the list of 1,687 retakers does not mean they cheated.
None of them are cheaters, but they simply did not pass the NLE using their original scores. (binalik po kasi sa original scores ang grade natin)
This list of 1,687 is not the list of Gapuz, Inress & pentagon reviewees (Gagawin pa po yon ng NBI).
Sad to say, that is you true grade & if you really failed, then your still lucky to be given a RETAKE for free.
Regarding the cheaters, NBI needs to finalize the lists, go to court & prove the involvement of the review centers.
If for example, GAPUZ was found guilty, NBI now needs to prove the involvement of the students who took their final coaching to be able to prosecute them.
Still, each student can defend their innocence one by one if they want to. I heard that Pentagon reviewees have solid proofs that they are not involved with irregularities. Lucky for them, I hope their evidences can also prove that INRESS & GAPUZ are not involved.
It's a long & hard process but they are following the due process. If done right, then justice have been served.
What always matter are FACTS. If you don't have any, then there's no point filing cases at all.
So far, all have been fair except for the malicious personalities, malicious media & institutions that base their allegations on sheer hearsays.
Just like the WRITER of this column that believed Dante Ang's reason that the leakage issue is the reason why NCLEX hesitated to make the Philippines one of its testing sites. That's COMPLETELY FALSE & BASELESS! For Dante ANG, that's "MALICIOUS INTENT" & for the writer of this column "IRRESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM".
DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE!
We have to wait & see for this to the very end.
All hopes up :-)
Posted by
Anonymous |
4:06 AM
Back to original computation na ang scores sa Test 1 to 5 sa NLE exam. so paano yan, hindi na "leakage free" ang scores ngayon?!
Posted by Anonymous | 6:07 PM
CRA! ang original computation minus Test V at part ng Tes III... passser ka ba or loserrr??? o gusto mo lang manlito... pasaway ka ha! :P
Posted by
Anonymous |
2:16 PM
Sana yung mga second courser na alumni ng UST (board passers) magkaisa at makipag negotiate sa UST College of Nursing.
Posted by
Anonymous |
4:35 PM
Simple lang ibig sabihin- PALPAK ang PRC. Noon pang simula, palpak na. Bakit kasi manipulate ng manipulate ng scores?
Ako mataas average ko at di naman borderline. Bakit ako pinaparetake? pakisabi sa mga kasam natin, wag si Grace Urquiaga Pacleb ang gawing spokesperson kasi mayabang siya at walang respeto at selfish magsalita. At saka matanda na siya. Halatang malapit nang mag50 years old. Marami sa atin na ayaw sa retake ang ayaw din sa kanya. Bat di rin tayo ang pagsalitain at baka maawa ang mga officials? Si Tita (Matanda, e) Grace kasi, nakakaturn-off ang dating. Parang ginagamit niya ang issue para sumikat. Laging siya ang nasa TV. Bakit siya e mas marami namang credible na magsalita.
NO to RETAKE even for the 1687!!! NO to GRACE PACLEB!!!
NO to PRC!!!
Posted by Anonymous | 4:39 PM
Haynaku, KURAK ka dyan. Ayaw ko rin kay Grace Pacleb or Pacquaio? Parang boxer ang dating sa laki ng katawan. Mayabang nga at kung magsalita dinadamay tayo. Siya lang naman ang natutuwa sa PRC. Balita namin nagreview sa Gapuz. At nag-aral daw ian na di nagduty kasi takot instructors sa kanya. Mas matanda siya e. Halatang ginagamit nga niya ang nursing issue para sumikat. Apir ng apir sa TV. She is not the best and most credible person to speak for us. Dapat ang magsalita, yung mga bata na gaya natin na di third courser. Sa tanda niya, baka pa nga fourth courser siya. Mayabang si Pacleb. Down with GRACE PACLEB. Tumigil ka na sa kadadakdak dahil nakakasira ka sa diskarte ng no-retakers! Sa true lang.
NO TO RETAKE!!!!
Posted by Anonymous | 5:14 PM
Sa totoo lang di siguro lumala ito kung hindi si Grace inihaharap natin na ayaw sa retake. Sabi nga nung makaretake, gusto nila ng retake para lang mahirapan si Grace kasi mayabang. Nakakasira sa ating krusada ang tabain na iyan. Talaga namang ginamit niya itong issue para sumikat. Never heard naman ang taong iyan bago itong nursing scandal. Kumbaga nagride-on siya. At puri siya ng puri kay Rosero. Kaya tuloy marami ang naghihinala sa pagpasa niya. Gracia, sana tumigil ka na at pabayaan mo kaming mga bata na magtrabaho. Magrest ka. Mas makakatulong ka kung itikom mo ang bibig mo. Siguro, mag-gym ka na lang. Balitaan ka rin namin sa nangyayari, otei?
Posted by Anonymous | 9:10 PM
Posted by
Anonymous |
9:43 PM
Ayan lumabas na ang mga bata na kulang sa maturity, naisama lang mga pangalan ninyo sa retake kung ano-ano na pinagsasalita ninyo diyan. Kung wala na mga pangalan ninyo sa magre retake mag react kayo. Kaya nga hindi kayo pinapagsalita kasi kung ano ano pang kapalpakan lalabas ng mga bunganga ninyo. Bakit ngayon lang kayo nag ingay laban kay Grace? Dahil nakita ninyo mga pangalan ninyo sa mag re retake? HOY TUMIGIL KAYO DYAN! Kasalanan niyan ng CA, hindi ni Grace at ng PRC. May magagawa kaya si Grace sa ruling ng CA? WALA. Hindi ko kakilala si Grace pero ang sama naman talaga pingsasabi ninyo tungkol sa kanya. Totoo mataba siya, mukhang boxer pero wala kayong karapatan na manghusga, kaya kayo binalikan ni LORD sa nagyayari sa inyo ngayon dahil sa simula pa mga masasama na mga ugali ninyo kaya mag-aral na lang kayo para sa susunod no amount of recomputation will let you fail. Maliwanag. Shut up!
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:36 PM
Akala ko sa election lang ang meron "Dagdag Bawas" dito rin pala sa PRC he! he! he! he!
Pero mga friends ganoon talga dito sa Pinas, iyong maliit ay siyang naapi at iyong malakas ay siyang nakikinabang. Example...
1. Tuwing meron raid sa mga beerhouse at nightspot, only girls and accordingly prostitutes ang nahuhuli pero ang manager palaging nakakawala.
2. Ang naglalako ng patalim at mga deadly weapons hindi hinuhuli pero ang bumili maaaring hulihin for illegal position of deadly weapons.
3. Dito sa Nursing exam batch 2006 ang mga may pakana ay nakakalaya pa pero ang mga Nurses ay nasa alanganin pa at naghihirap pa.
4. Pinipilit nilang paaminin ang mga Nursing examinee na meron leakage pero wala naman silang makuha na sapat na katibayan kung meron nga sa mga nag-exam, ang sabi meron daw umamin, eh di yun lang ang hulihin nila, kung wala naman silang makuha sa iba eh huwag na nilang pilitin pa. Ang gusto kasi nila ay pigain at pilitin na meron maparusahan doon sa mga kumuha ng exam samantalang ang mga may pakana ay hindi pa nakukulong at nakakalaya pa, pero pinipilit nila na meron student na managot. Hindi nila alam na hindi naman magagawa ng student ang leakage kundi galing sa isang nasa loob at hindi sa student. Natural lang naman sa student ang maghanap ng paraan at kahit na anong paraan para makapasa at hindi naman cheating yun kung meron man silang nakuha. Kasi nga kung meron ka man leakage kung hindi mo naman pag-aaralan yun eh hindi ka rin papasa, kailangan nga lang pag-aaralan mo rin di ba? at the same time kahit na sabihin pa na leakage yun ay hindi ka pa rin sure na yun na nga... hanggat hindi pa nalabas sa exam, kaya paano mo masasabing cheaters ang student na yun????
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:50 PM
Yung mga nag comment na ang yabang ni Grace , sila mismo ang mayabang. Nagpakahirap na nga yung tao para ipaglaban tayo, naiinis pa kayo. Gusto nyo pala magsalita eh di pumunta kayo sa media at magsalita. Kaya nyo ba yon mga iho at iha? Marunong ba kayo humarap sa camera at sumagot ng tama? Sa tema pa lang ng comments nyo, talo na ang ipaglalaban nyo.
"Pride".. the source of all evil!
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:10 AM
KASI NAMAN, ANO BA ANG SINABI NG GRACE TABA PACLEB SA VIEWPOINTS? ANG YABANG NIYA. KESYO DI DAW SIYA NAGREVIEW PARA PUMASA SIYA. THERE ARE MANY WAYS OF PASSING- LEGAL AT ILLEGAL. WAG NAMAN SANA SIYANG MAYABANG. WALA PALANG SILBI SA KANYA ANG LOCAL BOARD KAYA GANUN ANG ATTITUDE NIYA. GINAGAMIT LANG NIYA ANG ISSUE PARA MADISCOVER NA MAG-ARTISTA. PURO SILA NA LANG ANG NAGSASALITA FOR OUR GROUP E DI NGA SIYA CREDIBLE KASI NAKAKA-TURN-OFF ANG ARRIVE NIYA. MALAKAS MASYADO ANG HANGIN! SI TOTO NA LANG LAGI DAPAT! O MGA FIRST COURSERS. SA DAMI BA NAMAN NATIN NA ANTI-RETAKE NA FIRST COURSERS, NI ISA, WALA SILANG MAKITA NA PUEDENG MAGSALITA FOR US. IMPOSIBLE. NOT UNLESS GUSTO NILANG SILA LANG PARA NGA SUMIKAT!
FYI, DI AKO KASAMA SA LISTAHAN NG 1687. AT GAYA NI GRACE, DI AKO NAGREVIEW SA REVIEW CENTER.
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:15 PM
naku na 'out of context' nyo lang po siguro yung comment ni grace... she didn't mean any harm to all board passers... alam nyo naman ang media, lalo na kung abs-cbn, chop chop ang broadcasting nila lalo pa kung biased sila sa issue...
i have my respect for grace and toto aquino... sila po ang naging voice nating mga 'board passers' (both 1st coursers & 2nd coursers) kasi yung mga first coursers were not that organize pa at that time na kasagsagan ng nursing controversy...
ngayon po, madami na tayong 1st coursers na representative from diff schoolds na member ng ANN...
let us unite po - ALL 2006 BOARD PASSERS! huwag po tayong magpadala sa panggugulo ng media, UST, mga pulitiko sa issue... isa lang ang ipinag-lalaban natin dito - ang ating RN LICENSES!!!
GOD BLESS EVERYONE!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:14 PM