Nursing grads to sue those who tried to stop oath taking
By Norman Bordadora
Inquirer
Last updated 07:23pm (Mla time) 10/21/2006
NURSING graduates who took the June 2006 nursing board examinations are preparing damage suits against those who tried to stop the oath taking of passers through a court injunction.
Renato Aquino, president of the Alliance of New Nurses, on Saturday said those who had satisfactory scores in the leakage-marred boards have had bouts of depression and sleepless nights as a result of the continued delay in the issuance of their nursing licenses.
"We want them to suffer what we have suffered for the last four months," Aquino said at the weekly Kapihan sa Sulo news forum.
Aquino said their group is already coordinating with pro-bono lawyers to take on their case against Rene Luis Tadle, president of the faculty of the University of Sto. Tomas (UST) College of Nursing; Earl Francis Sumile, president of the League of Concerned Nurses; and Michael Angelo Brant, president of Binuklod na Samahan ng mga Student Nurses.
The three were the ones who filed for an injunction against the oath taking of those who passed the June 2006 nursing board examinations.
"We are coordinating with (the board passers) from different provinces and their parents to file damage suits. Primarily, the respondents are Tadle, Brant, and Sumile," Aquino said.
He said he and fellow passers also considering the inclusion of presidential adviser on overseas employment Dante Ang and Labor Secretary Arturo Brion in the damage suit.
Ang, who headed a presidential task force looking into the leakage scandal, had recommended a re-take of all examinees the nursing board exams held last June; some 17,000 of more than 40, 000 examinees passed.
Ang said that the re-take should apply to all examinees, and that it should cover only Tests 3 and 5, where cheating was confirmed to have occurred.
Brion, on the other hand, ordered that the oath taking for those who passed be postponed pending the Court of Appeals decision on the motion for reconsideration filed by Tadle and company.
The appellate court had earlier decided that a selective re-take be conducted.
FROM: INQ7.net
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=27967