Nursing grads to sue those who tried to stop oath taking
Nursing grads to sue those who tried to stop oath taking
By Norman Bordadora
Inquirer
Last updated 07:23pm (Mla time) 10/21/2006
NURSING graduates who took the June 2006 nursing board examinations are preparing damage suits against those who tried to stop the oath taking of passers through a court injunction.
Renato Aquino, president of the Alliance of New Nurses, on Saturday said those who had satisfactory scores in the leakage-marred boards have had bouts of depression and sleepless nights as a result of the continued delay in the issuance of their nursing licenses.
"We want them to suffer what we have suffered for the last four months," Aquino said at the weekly Kapihan sa Sulo news forum.
Aquino said their group is already coordinating with pro-bono lawyers to take on their case against Rene Luis Tadle, president of the faculty of the University of Sto. Tomas (UST) College of Nursing; Earl Francis Sumile, president of the League of Concerned Nurses; and Michael Angelo Brant, president of Binuklod na Samahan ng mga Student Nurses.
The three were the ones who filed for an injunction against the oath taking of those who passed the June 2006 nursing board examinations.
"We are coordinating with (the board passers) from different provinces and their parents to file damage suits. Primarily, the respondents are Tadle, Brant, and Sumile," Aquino said.
He said he and fellow passers also considering the inclusion of presidential adviser on overseas employment Dante Ang and Labor Secretary Arturo Brion in the damage suit.
Ang, who headed a presidential task force looking into the leakage scandal, had recommended a re-take of all examinees the nursing board exams held last June; some 17,000 of more than 40, 000 examinees passed.
Ang said that the re-take should apply to all examinees, and that it should cover only Tests 3 and 5, where cheating was confirmed to have occurred.
Brion, on the other hand, ordered that the oath taking for those who passed be postponed pending the Court of Appeals decision on the motion for reconsideration filed by Tadle and company.
The appellate court had earlier decided that a selective re-take be conducted.
FROM: INQ7.net
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=27967
By Norman Bordadora
Inquirer
Last updated 07:23pm (Mla time) 10/21/2006
NURSING graduates who took the June 2006 nursing board examinations are preparing damage suits against those who tried to stop the oath taking of passers through a court injunction.
Renato Aquino, president of the Alliance of New Nurses, on Saturday said those who had satisfactory scores in the leakage-marred boards have had bouts of depression and sleepless nights as a result of the continued delay in the issuance of their nursing licenses.
"We want them to suffer what we have suffered for the last four months," Aquino said at the weekly Kapihan sa Sulo news forum.
Aquino said their group is already coordinating with pro-bono lawyers to take on their case against Rene Luis Tadle, president of the faculty of the University of Sto. Tomas (UST) College of Nursing; Earl Francis Sumile, president of the League of Concerned Nurses; and Michael Angelo Brant, president of Binuklod na Samahan ng mga Student Nurses.
The three were the ones who filed for an injunction against the oath taking of those who passed the June 2006 nursing board examinations.
"We are coordinating with (the board passers) from different provinces and their parents to file damage suits. Primarily, the respondents are Tadle, Brant, and Sumile," Aquino said.
He said he and fellow passers also considering the inclusion of presidential adviser on overseas employment Dante Ang and Labor Secretary Arturo Brion in the damage suit.
Ang, who headed a presidential task force looking into the leakage scandal, had recommended a re-take of all examinees the nursing board exams held last June; some 17,000 of more than 40, 000 examinees passed.
Ang said that the re-take should apply to all examinees, and that it should cover only Tests 3 and 5, where cheating was confirmed to have occurred.
Brion, on the other hand, ordered that the oath taking for those who passed be postponed pending the Court of Appeals decision on the motion for reconsideration filed by Tadle and company.
The appellate court had earlier decided that a selective re-take be conducted.
FROM: INQ7.net
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=27967
Anonymous said...
Kung ako ang masusunod, huwag sumama sa bandwagon nang nagbabalak magdemanda kay Tadle ng damage suit. Baka tayo pa ang bueltahan ni Tadle. Bakit ida-damage suit natin sila pero di kasama ang PRC at BON? Ano ba tayo, Renato Aquino, mga galamay tayo ng PRC at BON? Sweet daw kayo ni Rosero. Kaya nahihirapan kaming magtiwala sa inyo kasi may mga motive kayong iba. Sa true lang, nakikinabang kayo sa isyung ito. Malapit ka nang mag-artista sa dami ng TV guestings mo. Kayo ang mga ginagamit nina Rosero para lumabas silang mga bayani samantalang sila ang may kagagawan nito. Puede bang huwag ninyong idamay si Atty. Saguisag? Imposibleng panig si Saguisag sa pagpo-pro-PRC ninyo dahil matino siya at marunong mag-analyze ng problema. Saan kayo, Renato Aquino nung unang pumutok ang leakage issue? Di ba, wala kayong pakialam na may cheating? Lumabas lang kayo dahil ang pangalan ninyo ay nasa listahan ng mga pumasa. Pag wala, I bet, kasama mo rin yung mga iba diyan na sinasabi ninyong nagpapahirap sa atin. Wala ka pang ipinakita, Renato Aquino na galit mo sa cheating. OK lang sa iyo na may cheating. Ang hindi OK, yung magretake ka. Double standard ang morality mo. Or baka wala pa. Aba, di na natin kilala kung sino talaga ang nag-cause ng paghihirap natin. Ano naman ang ginawa ni Tadle? Nag-agree nga ang court sa kanya na walang kuenta yung Resolution No. 31.
6:35 PM
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:47 PM
Right! Di naman si Tadle ang nagpigil ng oathtaking. Court of Appeals naman. Si Tadle lang naghimok. Di naman siguro tanga mga CA justices na basta pipigilan lang ang oathtaking kung walang basehan. Di naman porke hiningi ni Tadle e ibibigay basta basta. Bakit,ang ANN humingi naman ng lifting ng TRO sa oathtaking. Di naman ibinigay. Simple lang ibig sabihin, si Tadle may basis, si ANN wala. Period. That is the long and short of it. Period!
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:50 PM
Ang tanong mo,why not include Chairman Rosero? Kasi nga, maliwanag na ang mga kasama nating anti-retake ay mga alipures ni Rosero. Renato Aquino, please remember na di kami sang-ayon sa pag-pe-praise nyo kay Rosero at PRC. Dapat maging objective tayo dito. Bakit tayo nagkaproblema? Dahil kay Tadle? Dinugtungan lang niya ang kalbaryo natin na invention ng PRC. Palibhasa, marami sa ANN ang makasarili. At all costs, no retake. We are willing to deny or overlook that cheating took place para lang makuha natin gusto natin? Huwag naman ganyan. No to retake, no to Rosero, no to PRC.
Posted by
Anonymous |
4:10 PM
no retake ka dyan! very obvious, ikaw ang alipores ni tadle. if may karapatan si tadle to go to court, may karapatan din kami.
Posted by
Anonymous |
6:13 PM
Kung walang kasalanan si Tadle, sa mga Courts nationwide na lang siya magpaliwanag kung talagang wala.
Pero maghanda na siya ng pang lawyer, pang eroplano, pang-hotel and meals, etc. dahil tiyak kakailanganin niya ito.
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:57 PM
TAMA ANG ANN! Kung may dapat tayo pasalamatan, yan ay walang iba kundi si Chairman Rosero! mga gunggong! Ung 2 BON ang may sala at hindi ang PRC. At mas lalo tayong may karapatang mag file ng damage suits dahil sa pahirap nila sa atin....I mean sa amin lang pala kase ung mga naunang nagpost dito sa column na ito ay mga pro retake (na hindi pumasa??)
Natatakot lang kyo! Tadle et al....maghanda na kyong 3 nila Sumile at Brandt ng mga pang hotel at pamasahe ninyo pang tugon sa lahat ng kaso nyo all over the country.Pwede isama si Ang na din but I think not Sec Brion.Kahit pano he wants to put an end to al these.
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:05 AM
PRC has been trying to do its job... nagkaproblema lang kasi madaming nakikisawsaw tulad nina tadle at ang na akala mo masmagaling pa sa PRC at nakapagconduct ng licensure exams for several years....
Also di namin dinadamay si Atty Saguisag... siya mismo nag-offer to represent the examinees.
As for the CA agreeing that Resolution No. 31 was null and void... fine... null and void but they also found no logical bearing na nationwide ang leak at marami ang nakapagbenefit...Then comes along tadle with his motion after stating he'd respect the court's decision... forked tongue talaga.
Posted by
Anonymous |
8:45 AM
naku, yun 2 unang comment posts, i had a feeling isa lang author nyan... either from tadle's camp or kuyangot's camp... or tadle himself... posing as anti-retake daw...
tumahimik nga kayo! walang ni isa sa member ng ANN ang natuwa sa Leakage noh! ilang beses bang uulitin na kahit nakapikit kami at oral ang TEst V ay kayang-kaya sagutin yun mga tanung dun! THE LEAKAGE WAS INSULT AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL TO OUR PREPARATION! BALIW NA TULAD LANG NI TADLE ANG MAG-COMMENT NG COMMENT MO!
sabi nga nung isang no-retake member, mas may balls pa kay TADLE SI TOTO AQUINO NOH!!! AY MAS MAY DATING SA TV. nyehehe!
btw, we call ourselves NO-RETAKE not anti-retake! sablay ka talaga, Tadle!
ang cheap talaga ng tactic mo Tadle ng UST promise! tsk! tsk!
Posted by
Anonymous |
9:56 AM
sa totoo lang kaya nyo bang umapila sa SUMPRE COURT! WAG NA NGA TAYONG MAGTANGA-TANGAHAN TADLE! DAHIL KAHIT UMAPILA KAYO SA SUPREME COURT, DENIED ANG MOTION NYO... SISIHIN NYO ASAWA NG MAPAPEL NA SI ATTY KUYANGOT! DI KAYO PWEDENG UMAPILA SA SUMPRE COURT DAHIL MAY PRECEDENT NA - MERCANTILE LAW LEAKAGE!
ITURING KAYANG MGA BOBITO ANG MGA NURSE NITONG MGA KUMAG NA TOH! MGA PASAWAY KAYO! DAPAT ISAMA SA DEMANDA ANG LAHAT NG SUPPORTERS NI TADLE FROM UST! INCLUDING THE FACULTY MEMBERS NA NANG BE-BRAINWASH SA MGA UST BOARD PASSERS!
KAPAL NG MGA MUKHA NINYO! ULTERIOR MOTIVE NYO IS TO NULLIFY THE NLE! KASI GUSTO NYO BACK TO ZERO AT PARA MAY CHANCE ULI KAYONG PUMASOK SA TOP 10 SCHOOLS!!!
"SCHOOL RANKING" LANG AT THE EXPENSE OF 17,000 BOARD PASSERS, INCLUDING UST BOARD PASSERS! THAT IS 'IMMORALITY AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL'!!!
DI NYO NA INIISIP ANG PAGUD, HIRAP AT GASTOS NG MGA PAMILYA NAMIN!!! KADA ARAW NA LUMILIPAS, ILANG DAANG PISO ANG NAWAWALA SA AMIN (17,000 BOARD PASSERS AFFECTED), DAHIL ANG IBA SA AMIN AY DI MAKAKUHA NG NURSING JOB DAHIL WALANG LISENSYA!!! ANG KAPAL NG MUKHA NINYO!
CGURO TALAGANG IT WAS MEANT NA MADAMING BUMAGSAK SENYO! DAHIL SAKSAKAN AT UBOD KAYO NG YAYABANG! WE KNOW NA 1 YR IN ADVANCE NINYO PRENIPARE YUNG MGA HONOR STUDENTS NINYO! GIVING THEM RIGID REVIEW, MGA HONOR STUDENTS LANG! IN THE END IT TURN OUT NA 3 CUM LAUDE ANG BABAGSAK... I MEAN, BUMAGSAK YUNG HONOR STUDENTS NINYO SA MGA TESTS NA WALANG LEAKAGE!!!
AT YUNG MGA UST REGULAR STUDENTS PA NINYO ANG NAG-SIPASA... NGAYONG BINE-BRAINWASH NINYO SILA NA MAG-RETAKE GAYUNG PUMASA NA SILA!!!
SAAN NILA GAGAMITIN ANG MATAAS NA SCHOOL RATING MR TADLE???? SA AMERICA, KILALA BA ANG UST, MR TADLE????
ASAN ANG KATINUAN AT MGA PUSO NINYO! @#*@%$
Posted by
Anonymous |
10:18 AM
Yung 1st 3 comments, kulang na sa kukote, kulang pa sa pansin. Kung gusto nyo mapansin, lumapit kayo sa media, tutal pare pareho kayong pro Retake.
Bulok ang style nyo kasi BOBO kayo.. hahaha, kawawa talaga at terminal case na utak nyo
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:04 PM