'Retake' will not redeem PRC
'Retake' will not redeem PRC
Inquirer
Last updated 01:20am (Mla time) 10/18/2006
Published on Page A14 of the October 18, 2006 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer
Letters to the Editor
RETAKE or no retake -- the question lingers.
The controversy has boiled down to two major issues: the ability of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) to conduct a credible licensure exam and the capability of the nursing students to pass a nursing licensure exam (not their competence as nursing professionals since it will take many more trainings, other exams and more than a couple of years of actual performance to determine this).
Obviously, a retake will not resolve the issue on the PRC's competence to conduct a credible exam, given the fact that a human factor caused the exam's flaw. The system and conduct of the exam itself were almost perfect. The problem was in having people in the nursing exam board who were either gravely dishonest or grossly negligent. (A retake would probably cost the government another P42 million.)
What then is our guarantee that a retake will not be attended by another leakage? But what will stop dishonest and negligent examiners, who are determined to cheat for whatever reason, from writing down and leaking again test questions to interested parties?
The PRC's credibility has been tainted. Only having honest and responsible people will take that taint away-and "redeem the image of the Filipino nurses here and abroad." Until then, no retake can do that.
FR. JESUS V. DUMAUL, MSC, Sacred Heart Parish, Bantug, Science City of Muñoz
Inquirer
Last updated 01:20am (Mla time) 10/18/2006
Published on Page A14 of the October 18, 2006 issue of the Philippine Daily Inquirer
Letters to the Editor
RETAKE or no retake -- the question lingers.
The controversy has boiled down to two major issues: the ability of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) to conduct a credible licensure exam and the capability of the nursing students to pass a nursing licensure exam (not their competence as nursing professionals since it will take many more trainings, other exams and more than a couple of years of actual performance to determine this).
Obviously, a retake will not resolve the issue on the PRC's competence to conduct a credible exam, given the fact that a human factor caused the exam's flaw. The system and conduct of the exam itself were almost perfect. The problem was in having people in the nursing exam board who were either gravely dishonest or grossly negligent. (A retake would probably cost the government another P42 million.)
What then is our guarantee that a retake will not be attended by another leakage? But what will stop dishonest and negligent examiners, who are determined to cheat for whatever reason, from writing down and leaking again test questions to interested parties?
The PRC's credibility has been tainted. Only having honest and responsible people will take that taint away-and "redeem the image of the Filipino nurses here and abroad." Until then, no retake can do that.
FR. JESUS V. DUMAUL, MSC, Sacred Heart Parish, Bantug, Science City of Muñoz
USAPAN NA ITO NG MGA PASADO SA 2006 BOARD EXAM, HINDI NG MGA BUMAGSAK...
USAPAN NA ITO NG ‘DELAYED EXECUTION NG CA ORDER FOR OATHTAKING OF 17,000 BOARD PASSERS!
NA PARA LANG HA... PARA LANG... MA-ACCOMMODATE ANG REQUEST NG KAMAHAL MAHALANG UNIVERSITY OF STO. TOMAS!!!#$@*** AY SOBRANG BINABALE-WALA ANG 17,000 BOARD PASSERS!
YUNG 1,687 NA FOR RETAKE NGAYON AY PASADO NA SANA SILANG LAHAT KUNG DI DAHIL SA TRO AT KASELFISHAN NG UST… ANG DAPAT NA SISIHIN DITO AY UST… KUNG PRC ANG TATANUNGIN NINYO, KULANG NA LANG NA IPASA KAYONG LAHAT… HINDI GANUN KASAMA SILA MAM ROSERO, KAHIT SILA MAM OCTAVIANO… GUSTO NGA NILA NA I-GIVE AWAY NA SANA YUNG TEST 5, PARA MORE THAN 60% ANG PUMASA…PERO DAHIL SA KATALINUHAN NI ATTY YANGOT KINUMBINSE NYA ANG 90 BAGUIO WHISTLE BLOWERS NA MAG-COMPLAINT PARA SYA AY MAKILALA NG MADLA!!!
KUNG PUROS SARILI LANG NINYO ANG INYONG IISIPIN, PARE-PAREHAS TAYONG SA KANKUNGAN PUPULUTIN… AT PATULOY NA GAGAMITIN NG MEDIA, AT MGA PULITIKO!!! HOY GISING!!!
UTANG NA LOOB…
LEAKAGE FREE NA ANG NLE, BAGO PA I-RELEASE NG PRC ANG RESULT NG EXAM NUONG 19 JULY 2006!!!
MGA ‘IMBECILE’ LANG ANG DI MAKAKAINTINDI NITO!!! ANO BAH! @#$%*
AT HUWAG NINYONG KALIMUTAN YUNG OWNERS NG 3 REVIEW CENTERS! SILA ANG DAPAT NA MANAGOT SA LAHAT NG KAGULUHANG ITO!!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:35 PM
IKAW and IMBICILE gago!
You dont even know what your saying!!!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:46 PM
HOY! 12:46PM POSTER! MAS GAGO KA! 'TADO!
BAKIT?! IKAW BA YUNG NIRE-REFER NI 5:35PM POSTER NA IMBECILE?! O KASAMAHAN KA NG MGA TALANGKA FROM UST ET AL AT NUNG MGA BADING NA MAY-ARI NG REVIEW CENTERS NA NAGPAMUDMOD NG TIPS (NA LEAKED PALA) SA MGA KAAWA-AWANG MGA REVIEWEES NILA?!
ALAM NI 5:35PM POSTER ANG SINASABI NIYA AT HE/SHE MAKES SENSE, GAGO!
PARA KANG SI BAUTISTA, AH! KUNWARI WHISTLE BLOWER PARA SA IKAGAGANDA NG PROFESSION PERO ANG TOTOO KAYA NAG-WHISTLE BLOW, KASI BUMAGSAK. KAYA ANG GUSTO, LAHAT GUSTO IDAMAY!
ITONG MGA TALANGKA NAMAN SA UST, NAKAKITA NG PAWN NA PWEDENG GAMITIN PARA MA-ERASE YUNG BAD SHOWING NILA SA JUNE BOARD, GINAGAMIT SI BAUTISTANG BOBO!
KUNG MAY REKLAMO KA, POST YOUR FULL NAME AND CONTACT NUMBER DITO, 12:46PM POSTER! MAGHARAP TAYO, GAGO! ANG LAKAS MONG MAGMURA...
Posted by
Anonymous |
1:07 PM
hehehe... imbecile nga yata, tinamaan eh!! Bato bato sa langit ang tamaan huwag magagalit.. hahahay...
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:57 AM
haha! IMBECILE araay ko! tinamaan ako... araaay!!! hahaha!
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:49 PM