CA questions PRC re-computation of nursing results
CA questions PRC re-computation of nursing results
By Tetch Torres
INQ7.net
Last updated 07:58pm (Mla time) 09/14/2006
THE Court of Appeals questioned the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) re-computation of the scandal-tainted June nursing board licensure examination, wondering how the passing percentage could have increased when it should have gone down. Associate Justice Vicente Veloso asked government lawyers how, if the PRC's goal in re-computing the test results was make sure no one benefited from the leakage of exam questions, the number of passers went up by 1.8-percent from 41.24 to 42.42 percent.
He also asked what the point was of re-computing the test results when the leakage happened only in Baguio and Manila.Because of the leakage, PRC issued Resolution 31 invalidating portions of the nursing examination.
The appellate court will continue hearing on Monday the petition of the PRC for the lifting of a temporary restraining order the court issued last month against the oath-taking of board passers.
It also ordered the PRC to provide a list of the 41.24 percent who originally passed the exam
By Tetch Torres
INQ7.net
Last updated 07:58pm (Mla time) 09/14/2006
THE Court of Appeals questioned the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) re-computation of the scandal-tainted June nursing board licensure examination, wondering how the passing percentage could have increased when it should have gone down. Associate Justice Vicente Veloso asked government lawyers how, if the PRC's goal in re-computing the test results was make sure no one benefited from the leakage of exam questions, the number of passers went up by 1.8-percent from 41.24 to 42.42 percent.
He also asked what the point was of re-computing the test results when the leakage happened only in Baguio and Manila.Because of the leakage, PRC issued Resolution 31 invalidating portions of the nursing examination.
The appellate court will continue hearing on Monday the petition of the PRC for the lifting of a temporary restraining order the court issued last month against the oath-taking of board passers.
It also ordered the PRC to provide a list of the 41.24 percent who originally passed the exam
Masyado namang ginagawang kontrobersiyal ang board exam na yan. Tama na, ibigay niyo na ang lisensiya naming mga pumasa. Dapat hwag nang mainggit ang mga di pumasa, mag-retake na kayo para naman pumasa na kayo.
Posted by
Anonymous |
8:16 AM
Ang mga pinoy talaga mahilig sa kontrobersiya at sensasiyonalismo. maliit lang na bagay ang board exam na yan kung ikumpara sa problemang kahirapan na dinaranas ng mga kapwa Pilipino natin. Bakit hindi na lang tulungan ang mga mahihirap, imbes na gastusan ang board exam na yan. Kulang pa sa 1% ng populasyon ang mag-be-benefit sa board exam na yan.
Posted by
Anonymous |
8:19 AM
Feedback from those who were there at the hearing: That's the only negative comment towards the PRC lawyers, but during the entire event, the Justices & OSG grilled the UST lawyers.
Alam mo naman ang media, yun lang gusto nila ang i-publish nila...
FYI: The justices asked the UST lawyers why they respected the decision of PRC during the 1996 Physical Therapist Leakage that widely favored UST students & why they are not respecting PRC's decision now
.. Nakakahiya talaga UST, nung sila pala nandaya nung 1996, kinampihan nila PRC kaya walang retake, ngayon ayaw nila pumayag sa decision ng PRC... GRABE!!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
11:07 AM
KAWAWANG MGA TAGA PROVINCE, DAPAT SILA MISMO ANG NAGREREKLAMO SA PRC. WALA SILANG LEAKAGE, PERO BINAWASAN DIN YUNG GRADES NILA
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:23 PM
Ganito lang yan mga Brother & Sister...
Kung halimbawa meron leakage ang lahat ng kukuha ng board exam, ang passing requirement ay 75 pataas. Therefore may leakage o wala, meron papasa at babagsak.
Ganoon rin kung walang leakage ang lahat, 75 pataas, natural meron rin babagsak at papasa. Kaya pareho lang.
Kung sakali naman na nakapasa ang mga meron leakage, ay iyon ay dahil pasado talaga sila kasi alam lahat nila ang sagot aside doon sa leakage...
Kung sakali naman na bumagsak ang meron leakage ay dahil sa ang alam lang niya ay iyon lang na meron leakage at iyon lang marahil ang nasagutan niya...
Kaya nagpapatotoo lang ito na ang nakapasa ang talagang meron alam kesa doon sa hindi nakapasa...
Kung bumagsak ka naman na wala kang leakage ay dahil talagang wala kang alam...
Kaya ang maiiingay dito ay iyon talagang hindi nakapasa at iba ang ingay nila kesa doon sa mga nakapasa, alam mo na yun, kahit sa klase maingay ang mahina ang ulo kesa doon sa tahimik.
Posted by
Anonymous |
1:24 PM
HOY, UST DEAN AND OTHER COMPLAINANTS FROM UST:
PAKI-ISPLIKA NGA, BAKIT HINDI NINYO PINAG-ARURUTAN ANG RETAKE NG PHYSICAL THERAPIST EXAM NA MAY LEAKAGE NUNG 1996--DAHIL PABOR SA UST ANG WALANG RETAKE?
PERO NGAYON, DI KAYO MAHAPAYANG GATANG AT GUSTO NYO NG RETAKE-- PARA MAGKAROON NG CHANCE NA MAG-TOP SA RETAKE ANG BEST BETS NINYO NA DI NAG-TOP NG JUNE 2006 EXAM!!!!!
KALA NYO DI NAMIN ALAM!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
1:57 PM
Kya nga, ang mga taga UST n yan..mga pagulo.Mga THOMASIANs,,can u pls stop insisiting a retake coz wala nmang mgandang idudulot yan...Tumigil n lng po kau s kakareklamo..Accept the fact n hndi kau topnotchers...Wala kau mgagawa, mgaling at GENIUS tlaga c GRINGO SAN DIEGO..As a matter of fact, parati sya topnotcher s mga exams nung ngrrview p lng kmi....
Sana tanggalin n ng Supreme Court ang TRO samin...Kawawa naman kmi..Pati kmi innocents, damay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:35 PM
UST
noong sila ang nag benefit, nanahinik sila at nirespeto ang decision ng PRC.
Ngayon, nag iingay sila dahil bumagsak ang 2 cum aude nila at mababa sa 90% ang percentage ng passing nila.....
Haaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!! CRAB MENTALITY!
UST PTRPs Batch '96 - May stigma din pala!!! RETAKE!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:58 PM
ATTENTION ALL JUNE 2006 BOARD PASSERS...
PLEASE GIVE OUR SUPPORT TO THOSE FIGHTING FOR US (FOR THE LIFTING OF THE TRO) BY SHOWING UP TO BE COUNTED AT THE COURT OF APPEALS (OROSA ST. IN MANILA, BEHIND SUPREME COURT) TOMORROW, MONDAY (SEPTEMBER 18, 2006) BETWEEN 9-9:30AM.
WE NEED TO SHOW THE JUDGE HEARING OUR CASE THAT, INDEED, INJUSTICE WAS MADE ON US WHEN WE WERE DENIED OUR OATH-TAKING AND SUBSEQUENT LICENSING.
PLEASE BE THERE TOMORROW.
PLEASE PASS THIS MESSAGE TO ALL YOUR CONCERNED FRIENDS.
THANK YOU.
Posted by
Anonymous |
4:55 PM
HAY NAKU UST ----STOP SOURGRAPING..WALA KAYO MAGAGAWA KUNG MAS MAGALING ANG MGA TAGA PROVINCE...TAMA NA!!!! ACCEPT REALITY --HINDI LAGI KAYO ANG TOPNOTCH...OK? ANG BUHAY WEDER WEDER LANG OKEI?
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:59 PM
Think before you speak. Clear your emotions and think logically by then you might see the light. Wala na direction arguments nyo. Stick to the basic issue.
Posted by
Anonymous |
10:00 AM
respect the decision of court of appeals... UST... let us move on and accept the fact that you don't have to be the topnotcher because there are always born greater than you or anyone.
PRC... do not allow the retake because it will become a chain soon for those who failed..making leakage as an excuse for another retake... Pls release our license.. God bless!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:34 PM
Mr. brion, We just want you to know that we understand what you are doing right now. However, pls understand also the innocent people involved in here. Do not prolong our agony and our parents as well. PRC stand firm on your decision and respect the CA's ruling. Allow us have our oathtaking and release our license asap. The world needs us.... Thanks and more power!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
7:41 PM