Health activists blame CHED for nursing board leak
Health activists blame CHED for nursing board leak
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=21481
By Alcuin Papa
Inquirer
Last updated 05:32pm (Mla time) 09/17/2006
A GROUP of militant health workers said on Sunday that giving the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) supervision of review centers is rewarding it for the alleged incompetence that led to the alleged leakage in the last nursing board exam.
The Health Alliance for Democracy (HEAD) added that the CHED itself is responsible for the leakage by not checking the deterioration of the quality of nursing education in the country.
“Putting nursing review centers under the CHED to supposedly monitor and regulate them is like giving (the illegal drug) shabu to a known addict in dire need of rehabilitation,” said Rosamond Olivar, a nurse at the Philippine General Hospital and HEAD spokesperson.
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=21481
She added: "The proliferation of review centers is largely an offshoot of the substandard education provided by many nursing schools. This substandard education has been abetted and perpetuated by the CHED itself."
Olivar noted that the CHED had disregarded and continues to ignore recommendations of its own Technical Committee on Nursing Education (TCNE) on how to improve the quality of nursing education.
This is the reason, Olivar said, that prompted members of the TCNE to resign last July.
“The CHED has buckled down to pressure from poor performing schools, politicians and Malacañang by sacrificing quality for mediocrity and business interests,” Olivar stressed.
Dr. Gene Alzona Nisperos, HEAD secretary-general, also said CHED had failed in its mission to ensure and maintain quality higher education. “The mushrooming of nursing review centers is undeniable proof of this since the existence of review centers is anathema to quality education. So why should the CHED be given additional tasks?"
The group also said the recent controversy over review centers was being used by the Arroyo government, the CHED in particular, to milk revenues from review centers which have been operating at a profit.
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=21481
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=21481
By Alcuin Papa
Inquirer
Last updated 05:32pm (Mla time) 09/17/2006
A GROUP of militant health workers said on Sunday that giving the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) supervision of review centers is rewarding it for the alleged incompetence that led to the alleged leakage in the last nursing board exam.
The Health Alliance for Democracy (HEAD) added that the CHED itself is responsible for the leakage by not checking the deterioration of the quality of nursing education in the country.
“Putting nursing review centers under the CHED to supposedly monitor and regulate them is like giving (the illegal drug) shabu to a known addict in dire need of rehabilitation,” said Rosamond Olivar, a nurse at the Philippine General Hospital and HEAD spokesperson.
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=21481
She added: "The proliferation of review centers is largely an offshoot of the substandard education provided by many nursing schools. This substandard education has been abetted and perpetuated by the CHED itself."
Olivar noted that the CHED had disregarded and continues to ignore recommendations of its own Technical Committee on Nursing Education (TCNE) on how to improve the quality of nursing education.
This is the reason, Olivar said, that prompted members of the TCNE to resign last July.
“The CHED has buckled down to pressure from poor performing schools, politicians and Malacañang by sacrificing quality for mediocrity and business interests,” Olivar stressed.
Dr. Gene Alzona Nisperos, HEAD secretary-general, also said CHED had failed in its mission to ensure and maintain quality higher education. “The mushrooming of nursing review centers is undeniable proof of this since the existence of review centers is anathema to quality education. So why should the CHED be given additional tasks?"
The group also said the recent controversy over review centers was being used by the Arroyo government, the CHED in particular, to milk revenues from review centers which have been operating at a profit.
http://newsinfo.inq7.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=21481
sa bawat kaguluhang nangyayari... madaling maghanap ng mga taong masisisi...
baket nga ba may leakage? ano nga ba ang ugatng prblemang ito??? maaaring nais ng ibang kolehiyong maka 30% na passing rate... nang sa gayon, hindi maisama sa listahan ng "low performing skuls" ang kanilang paaralang nanganganib na bawian ng lisensyang maipagpatuloy ang kursong "narsing" ... ito'y mangangahulugan na unti unting pagbaba ng kanilang "income"... (hindi ba trabaho ng CHED ang striktong pagsisiyasat kung ang isang paaralan ay sumusunod sa kanilang mga alituntunin? :-) nakapagtataka nga na isa ang aking paaralan na iilan lamang ang nararapat na tawaging tunay na "guro"... karamihan ay wala o di tapos ng MA degree ang pinagkakatiwalaan upang "magturo" sa amin... katwiran bang maitatawag ang "pagtitipid"? can't afford ang skul magbayad sa mga gurong may MA... o de kalidad ang experience... gusto ko ngnang tumambling paminsan... dahil pati english construction... animoy ika'y nasa isang gag show.. dahel sa ktawa tawang "sentence"... mag-isip ka kung anong klase ng mga studyante ang hawak ng mga gurong ito...
... sa probelema ng leakage... napakaraming nadamay... pati mga studyanteng ang ninais lamang ay makapasa at matawag silang ganap na narses... anong naging masama sa pagbibigay ng dugo at pawis para makapasa? anong aksalanan ng studyante para ipagkait sa kanya ang bagay na hindi madaling nakuha? kabi kabila ang paliwanag... pagalingan ng explanasyon kung sino ang tama... at kung anong tamang gawin... palakasan ng boses... pataasan ng posisyon... pano ang mga studyanteng hindi na yata naririnig ang tinig dahil sa dami ng ingay na pumapaligid?
CHED ginawa nyo ba ng mahusay ang inyong trabaho? aming paaralan.. tinuruan nyo ba kme ng husto? PRC... ano't papalit palit ka ng desisyon kung pano kokomplyutin ang aking marka? Dante Ang... yan bang pananaw mo... para lang mahikayat ang NCLEX dito... na hindi iniisip ang kapakanan ng bawat studyante? Tuazon.. isa kang Dean ng UP... baket kulang na lang isampal mo sa mukha namen na iilan lang kayong magaling... nasan ang puso mo? anong ginawa nameng nasa hindi kalidad na paaralan para ituring mong isang basura sa mata ng mga banyaga? UST... isa kayong malakas na hampas ng unos, na pilit kinikitil ang buhay ng mga studyanteng nagsisimula pa lang mangarap... pero alalahanin ninyong... may mas malakas pa rin sa inyo... yan ang luha ng bawat magulang at studyanteng pilit inaalipusta...
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:31 AM
ano't nanggitil kyo sa mga review centers... sa totoo lang... d hamak na magaling pa ang mga review centers kesa sa mga paaralan... isipin mong kaya nilang hubugin ang pagiisip ng isang studyante sa loob ng 2 linggo hanggang tatlong buwan...
hmnnnn.... san nga ba nagsimula ang leakage...???
ano nga bang nauna... ang itlog o ang manok???
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:36 AM