July 2011 Nursing Board Exam Results July 2011 Nurse Licensure Examination Results

SPECIAL REPORT: Nursing leakage

UST nursing college an exemplar

By Grace R. Mercado
http://manilatimes.net/national/2006/sept/27/yehey/top_stories/20060927top7.html

Eleven thousand applicants, 650 accepted. A 10-year average of more than 90 percent passing rate in the nursing licensure examination. Awarded Center of Excellence in Nursing Education by the Commission on Higher Education. Granted Level 2 accreditation by the Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation. Part of a university that recently received the Philippine Quality Awards in Recognition of Proficiency in Quality Management (Level 2) by the Department of Trade and Industry.

This is the College of Nursing of the University of Santo Tomas.

Celebrating its 60th anniversary this year, the College of Nursing of UST has always been a bastion of quality nursing education in the country. Its graduates have enjoyed success while maintaining and living Thomasian values of competence, compassion and commitment in various positions they hold. It could be in hospitals here and abroad, in private and government institutions, in academe and the business sector.

While other universities and nursing schools have been aggressive in their expansion, the UST college has always maintained its class number. Only recently has it expanded from an average of eight sections to ten from the second to the fourth year.

“Expanding is not merely a question of adding classrooms or buying more computers. It is a question of ensuring that the students will be properly mentored. We want to maintain an ideal teacher to student ratio in the college, and by teachers I don’t just mean any teacher, but highly qualified experienced nursing professionals in their field of practice,” explained Prof. Glenda Vargas, dean of the college.

Within the university the college has always been described as reserved, preoccupied with the daily grind of the classroom and hospital duties, often even failing to attend to university affairs to catch up on the lectures. The college is a community within what is usually described a “conservative” university. On the other hand, the college, particularly the faculty members, has always been seen as a unified force; it has always acted and voted as one in both university and faculty issues.

The recent licensure leakage scandal and, before it, the resignation of the CHED Technical Committee on Nursing Education that rocked the nursing profession sounded like an ambulance siren in the collective consciousness of the college, particularly of the faculty. These have awakened an otherwise docile institution, making it “sleeping giant” no more. Wishing to shed light on the issue, the officers of the Faculty Association of the college have sought an audience with the Association of Deans of Philippine Colleges of Nursing and written to the Board of Nursing and the Philippine Regulation Commission. But as more information came in, the more it became clear that the solutions put forward by the nursing leaders and the commission only further put in doubt the integrity of the licensure examination.

Much has been said of the technical details of the issue; in fact, a case filed by the colleges’ Faculty Association is pending at the Court of Appeals. Suffice it to say that as a community of Catholic teachers, the college, true to its Dominican roots, stands for the truth and the genuine effort to search for the truth. As a community of mentors of future nursing professionals and leaders, the college, its faculty members in particular, cannot simply go back to the classroom as if all is well, because all isn’t well.

How do you continue teaching new nurses when the regulation commission can simply decide that retaking the board examination is optional? How do you continue to motivate the students to be at their best, when some self-styled nursing leaders argue that the new nurses “will be trained in the hospital anyway and that is where they would prove their competence?” This issue is indeed beyond the “retake-no retake” conflict.

This is about nursing education, and the deplorable state some government agencies and moneyed interests allow it to be. This issue is beyond the Class of 2006. This is an issue for all current and future nursing students. This is not only about the here and now, but more so the future. And it is because of this future that the University of Santo Tomas College of Nursing, drawing strength and inspiration from its storied history and tradition, its commitment to excellence and the pursuit of the truth, has taken a stand.

This issue simply hits home

FROM: http://manilatimes.net/national/2006/sept/27/yehey/top_stories/20060927top7.html

Posted by Thor on Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 5:19 PM | Permalink

Archives

amen....

Posted by Anonymous | 5:36 PM

Hmmmmm... Ganun pala.... Kaya pala mga CUM LAUDE nyo, eh HINDI PUMASA! HAHAHA

Posted by Anonymous | 6:39 PM

At nag pa interview pa ang SUMA CUM LAUDE... Di daw siya pumasa kasi magaling daw siya sa psych kaso nabawasan ng weight dahil sa recomputation kaya bumagsak siya...

SUMA CUM LAUDE ka pre! Psych lang alam mo? NAKAKAHIYA ka lalo!

Posted by Anonymous | 6:42 PM

Nabawasan ang weight sa recomputation, eh lahat naman ganun, nabawasan din ng weight, eh bakit yung iba pumasa, bakit siya hindi?

Posted by Anonymous | 7:22 PM

kung summa cum laude ka talaga magaling ka sa lahat ng subjects.. hindi lang sa isa!

Posted by Anonymous | 7:23 PM

that is called rationalization hehehe, cguro naman alam nya yun!!!

Posted by Anonymous | 8:29 PM

ang masasabi ko lang:
UTANG NA LOOB!

well di nman assurance ang pagiging cum laude to pass the board exam lumaki lng tlga ulo.

i dont think na ang pinaglalaban ng ust ay integrity of the nursing proffesion but the integrity of the SCHOOL... imagine expected top notcher nila sa board bumagsak 2nd ang usual na mataas na board rating of all nursing school sa phil bumaba din cla around 80%..

well kung bagsak di ba retake din ang solution bkit idadamay pa ung mga pumasa its because gusto nila manguna.. nasan ngaun ung reason na pagiging wholesome school nu..

at sa dean ng ust nkakahiya ka parang wala kaung prof ad un lng.. ur such a shame to the nursing prof.
imagine pati stud nu hinohold ang credentials para sumama sa side ayan ung mga pumsa sa board ah well guys pinipilit lng cla..

Posted by Anonymous | 9:09 PM

mali ung spelling hehehe profession hehe sowi

Posted by Anonymous | 9:12 PM

Pag nag-retake ba, solve na ang perennial problem of cheating?

Saka, it is not a matter of asking 42,000 examinees to retake Tests 3 and 5. Kailangang i-sort out yung talagang bagsak sa ibang subjects na dapat magretake hindi lang ng Tests 3 and 5 kung hindi lahat ng Tests 1 to 5.

Otherwise, magdadalawang retake sila. Na kahit ipasa nila yung retake ng Tests 3 and 5, ay hindi pa rin sila pasado sa entire exam dahil bagsak rin sila sa Tests 1, 2, and 4. Kaya kailangang isabay na nila ang pag-retake nito.

Dapat ma-realize ito ng PRC, na kailangang himayan nila yung ang retake ay Tests 3 and 5 lamang sa ang retake ay dapat entire exam.

In fact, dapat yung Test 5 lang ang may retake, not Test 3. Kaya lang, talagang bobo yung mga gustong isali sa retake ang Test 3. Kaya dapat paratingin ang kasong ito hindi lang sa Court of Appeals kung hindi hanggang sa Supreme Court.

Sasabihin nila, punish the guilty but spare the innocent, eh bakit yung mga inosenteng passers sa Mindanao na malayo sa cheating ay kasali rin?

Kung ganyan din lang ang usapan, ay protect na rin ang integrity hindi lang ng nursing profession kung hindi buong bansa. Remove the doubt of cheating in the last national election--REELECTION na rin ng Presidente!!!!

Posted by Anonymous | 9:56 PM

WOW ANG BANGO NAMAN NG PANGALAN NG UST! SI DANTE ANG PALA ANG MAY ARI NG MANILA TIMES.SAAN BA GALING ANG ARTICLE NA ITO? AHHHHHHH SA MANILA TIMES.

Posted by Anonymous | 11:17 PM

Hehe ganda article, UST IS SO GREAT, hmm ngayon pa ilabas.. suicidal ba kayo?

Payag na nga ako sa retake basta test 3 and 5 lang. SIGE NA RETAKE NA PARA DAW PUMASA NAMAN SI ANGELO BRANT, pag ikaw bumagsak pa rin, mapapalakol ka namin. Wag buong exam, pwede ba abuso na yan.

O nga pala since libre daw pamasahe natin NG PNA SA STATES, MAG TAXI NA TAYO PEOPLE.
Eh yung gastos ko rin paki sama, pati yung pang alis ng stress ko puhlease.

1. Ice cream - strawberry.. yung HALF GALLON
2. NARUTO DVD - episode 180 to 200.. ayan ha tipid na.
3. May bagong pocket book si JOHANNA LINDSEY - MARRIAGE MOST SCANDALOUS.
4. Gusto ko bago shoes ko sa pag take para swerte.
5. Bili nyo ko jacket kasi baka aircon, pamaypay pag hindi aircon.
6. Mag grocery na rin kayo snacks ko in between exams.
7. Patahi nyo po ako bago uniform kasi po masikip na sakin hehe. mga 2 lang naman para wala na labahan sa 2nd day.
8. Mongol number 2, mga apat kasi ayaw ko na magtasa eh at isa pong eraser.
9. Baon po na pera mga 200 a day pwede na po, kasi baka mauhaw ako.
10. Load sa celohone kasi kailangan ko i txt or call si mama baka kinakabahan d ba, alam nyo naman mothers. :p

wag nyo po kalimutan yung PAMASAHE SA TAXI PAG UWI KO. salamat mga 200 pesos rin yun.

Posted by Anonymous | 1:20 AM

wahh nakalimutan ko pabili daw si RACHEL NG VICTORIA'S SECRET NA THONG, yun daw gamitin nya.

Posted by Anonymous | 1:23 AM

ANGELO BRANT --- Ang BOBO MO!!

Posted by Anonymous | 3:29 AM

i dnt know why most people dont want a retake, eversince....i want a retake salahat to clear out all things...its the best decision, dati galit na gal;it mga tao sa retake, di maintindihan how important it is to retake, e ngaun sa retake din lng ang bagsak,so ano ngaun?... im aPRO-RETAKE eversince & now im verry happy na magreretake nanga lahat, ur all mad @ UST while they are just doing whatthey need to do...for the integrity of nursign profession, dami kseng inggit sa UST, im not a thomasian....basta retake na kayo para masukat talaga....common sense & logic invalid talaga ang result cozdaming itemsang di na count...peace bro!...God Bless!!!

Posted by Anonymous | 7:07 AM

sa dami ng bawas sa items nakapasa pa rin kami... clear the name of the nursing profession? hello?... ni di pa nga kami naging nurse ang laki na ng obligasyon namin. pano yung name namin as decent filipino citizens?... masnapahiya pa kami compared to madeja and dionisio. saan na sila? si gapuz? si cordero?... si Tadle anong ginawa niya to prevent this scandal?... maiinggit sa UST? puhlease... inggit lang yung suma nilang di pumasa...

Posted by Anonymous | 7:57 AM

UST LOST IT'S INTEGRITY THE DAY THEIR SUPPOSEDLY HONOR STUDENTS FAILED THE NLE... AND STARTED RECRUITING DENNIS BAUTISTA FROM PCHS TO BE INERVIEWED BY MEDIA... AS THEIR STAR WITNESS!!! WHAT A SHAME!!!

AND HOW ON EARTH THAT 3 CUM LAUDES FROM UST WLD FAIL NLE MINUS TEST 3 & 5!!! MIND BOGGLING HUH...

Posted by Anonymous | 8:46 AM

ALL BOARD PASSERS!
Let's gather tomorrow, Friday, 29 Sept in PRC. @ 8am...

Let's show our disgust to GMA's decision.

Let's show our disgust to UST (Tadle & Brant et al!)...

Bring your friends & family!!!
Let's be ONE!!!... NO RETAKE!

Posted by Anonymous | 9:15 AM

UST---SUS KARAMING "IPIS SA SOUP" DITO...KAKAAWA MGA STUDENTS KASI WALANG MATUTUNANG TAMANG VIRTUES DITO..SA NLE HINDI MATANGGAP ANG PAGKATALO PATI SA BASKETBALL!!!! HAY GRABE IBABA NYO NAMAN NANG KONTI ANG MGA PAA NYO SA LUPA BAKA NAMAN LUMAMPAS PA KAYO SA LANGIT SA KAYABANGAN NYO MGA TAGA UST!!!

Posted by Anonymous | 9:25 AM

Center of Excellence DAW!!!

Summa cum laude bagsak! VERY GOOD TALAGA.

Ang BOBO mo ANGELO BRANT...kahit mag top ka pa sa Dec! di na mabubura pangalan mo!!! BOBO KA FOREVER!!! tinalo ka pa ng 83% ng classmates mo!

Taga UST din ako (from the other more prestigious colleges!!!) nahihiya ako dahil summa ng ibang college bagsak!!! at lumabas pa sa media!!! kamusta naman un?

UST MANDARAYA YAN!!!

PT 1996!!! 45% leakage nila.. may retake ba? wala! from Top 1-90 UST! kamusta naman un.

First Bar Exams dayaan. UST din!!! 1981!!!

and hello ang nagprint MANILA TIMES!!! Dante Ang! IPIS

Basta mahirap na buharin sa utak ng isang kapwa Tomasino na BOBO ang college of nursing ng UST!!!

ANGELO BRANT kahihiyan ka LETSE!!!

GMA isa pang IPIS!!! nagbago na naman ng isip!!! "I'll NEVER RUN AGAIN!" "NO RETAKE!"

Sinungaling na presidente!!! mag komunista nako!

Posted by Anonymous | 10:35 AM

GMA RETAKE BA???

sino ba talaga nanalo last elections?

bumaba ka sa pwesto to save the integrity of this country!

Posted by Anonymous | 10:40 AM

oo nga tanggap ko kung isang cum laude lang... pero 3 cum laude's ang bumagsak from UST sa NLE...

hirap i-comprehend nyan...
anung klaseng review ang ibinigay sa kanila ng UST nursing faculty nila?

o baka 'maling leakage' ang na-review nila... hehe! :P

Posted by Anonymous | 11:03 AM

"A 10-year average of more than 90 percent passing rate in the nursing licensure exam...
This is the College of Nursing of the University of Santo Tomas....Celebrating its 60th anniversary this year, the College of Nursing of UST "

o ayan, di na nakapagpigil sinabi na ang totoo...kaya pala nagpuputok ang butse ng UST kasi MALINAW NA MALINAW... 90% PASSING DAW KASI SILA... di nila matanggap na wala sa top 10 ang school nila... a ganun pala yun...

AT ang mga pambato... ANG MAGIGITING NA 3 (TATLO) CUM LAUDE'S, special mention si angelo brant na self- acclaimed suma cum laude, at bakit di naman daw pumasa... bakit? bakit? bakit?

kelangan may masisi sila... kelangan may managot sa pagbagsak ng kanilang 3 honor students...

ang sigaw ni 'tadle at brant et al'..."ikalat sa lahat na invalid ang 2006 NLE coz of leakage"... sisihin si cordero ng PNA... pati na din PRC... pagkat ang PRC, di sila marunong mag-compute... akalain mong tanggalin nila ang tests na may leakage - test 3 & 5... e sa test 5 pa naman daw magaling si brant... akalain mo nga naman yan...tsk! tsk!

Posted by Anonymous | 11:32 AM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!! UTOS NI DANTE ANG YAN! HAHAHAHAHAHA

HOY UST! GUMISING NA KAYO! TANGGAPIN NYO NANG PUMAPALYA RIN KAYO! ANO KAYO? DYOS???

AT TALAGA NAMANG NAGPAPRESS RELEASE PA KAYO! MANILA TIMES???? WALANG KREDIBILIDAD! HAWAK NG GOBYERNO YAN! HELLEEEEEEEEERRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

KAYO MANIWALA SA SARILI NYO DAHIL HINDI BULAG ANG IBANG TAO!

Posted by Anonymous | 5:47 PM

AT ANGELO BRANT! WAHAHAHAHA! TAENA PARE NATALO KA PA NG DI HAMAK NA PASANG-AWA! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

SIGURO UMIIYAK KA SA GABI ANO??? KAHIT MAGTOP KA PA SA DECEMBER, DI MO MAAALIS NA TAKE TWO KA! MOKONG! SINO NILOKO MO???? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

INIBA NA NGA ANG COMPUTATION DI KA PA RIN PUMASA???!!!!!!!!!!! NAKAKATAWA TALAGA! ISAKSAK MO SA BAGA MO YAN!

Posted by Anonymous | 5:50 PM

Copy of Email from a concerned citizen to OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
AND OTHERS CONCERNED, copy furnished selected senators, congressmen, PRC Chairman, members of media, etc.:

ON 42,000-EXAMINEE EXAM RETAKE,
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE DEMOCRATIC TENET: PUNISH THE GUILTY AND SPARE THE INNOCENT?

Pag nag-retake po ba ang 42,000 examinees, solved na ang perennial problem of cheating? Me foolproof system na ba na magsisiguro na ang retake mismo ay wala ng cheating? Ano ang mga steps na gagawin para in a short period of time ay mayroong foolproof system within the year?

Saka, it is not a matter of asking 42,000 examinees to retake Tests 3 and 5. Kailangang i-sort out yung examinees na talagang bagsak sa ibang subjects at dapat magretake hindi lang ng Tests 3 and 5 kung hindi lahat ng Tests 1 to 5. (Otherwise, magdadalawang retake sila, at hindi dapat ang pagtake ng entire exam in two installments—dahil mas madali yan at baka may umangal na naman.) Na kahit ipasa nila yung retake ng Tests 3 and 5, ay hindi pa rin sila pasado sa entire exam dahil bagsak rin sila sa Tests 1, 2, and 4 at ang average grade nila ay hindi passing. Kaya kailangang isabay na nila ang pag-retake ng Tests 1, 2, and 4.

Dapat ma-realize ito ng PRC at Malacanang, na kailangang HIMAYIN nila yung ang retake ay Tests 3 and 5 lamang at ihiwalay sa ang retake ay dapat entire exam! Kung ang retake ay SEPARATE sa regular exam in December, ay hindi 42,000 ang kasali dito, yun lang na kung maipapasa ang Tests 3 and 5 ay pasado na sa entire exam! Kung SABAY naman, dapat himayin at pagkatapos ay bigyan ng notice ang lahat ng examinees. Yung nag-meeting sa Malacanang na nagsabi ng retake ng 42,000, hindi siguro inisip ito kaya akala nila ay ganun kabilis ang magpa-retake ng 42,000. Kailangang mag-ingat sa paghimay dahil puedeng magkamali diyan kung hindi foolproof ang instructrions o programming sa computer.

In fact, worst case scenario, dapat yung Test 5 lang ang may retake, not Test 3. Kaya lang, talagang matigas yata ang ulo (bobo o tuso?) nung mga may gustong isali sa retake ang Test 3. The 17,000 PASSERS have earned VESTED RIGHTS on Test 3, na may natirang 80 or enough valid questions (more than the first 60 graded questions in NCLEX that if answered right enough, the examinee is immediately declared as PASSER of the entire exam with many subjects), kaya dapat walang retake nito.

Sa totoo lang, kaya gustong isama ang retake ng Test 3 sa Test 5 ay dahil kung Test 5 lang ang may retake at nakarating ang issue sa Supreme Court, eh di SIMILARLY SITUATED ito sa 2003 scandal-rocked bar exam na isang subject lang, Mercantile Law, ang may issue ng leakage kaya nagkaroon ng PRECEDENT na NO RETAKE, excluded na lang ang entire subject sa recomputation ng grades--at kung COVERED NG PRECEDENT eh di timbog ang retake proponents sa Supreme Court!!! Kala nyo di namin alam, he, he, he!

Pero, ang mahal na Pangulo, alam ba niya ito? Kung hindi, naisahan siya at ang mga 17,000 passers at pamilya nito nung nagpa-approve sa kanya ng retake without full disclosure of relevant facts—TANTAMOUNT TO MISREPRESENTATION! Di hindi pala sila bobo kung hindi tuso?

Walang sure passing sa board exams, kahit nga honor graduates may bumabagsak dito, tulad nung sa UST, kaya passers want to protect and preserve their hard-earned rights. Dahil may element of LUCK din ito, depende sa kung ang napag-aralang mabuti ng examinee ang siyang lalabas sa exam o hindi—kaya kayabangan o katangahan ang sabihing kung pumasa nung una ay pasado rin sa retake kaya dapat pumayag agad sa retake. Sabagay, hindi ito alam ng mga hindi nakaranas na kumuha ng mahirap na board exam sa buong buhay nila—tulad ni Dr. Dante Ang???

In fairness to the PASSERS, kung ang retake ay Test 5 lang, kung sakaling malasin sila at hindi pumasa sa retake ay posibleng CONDITIONED pa rin sila, hindi total flunker, at pag umulit uli ay Test 5 lang ang uulitin. So including Test 3 in the retake is not a simple matter. It INFRINGES on the VESTED RIGHTS of passers who have substantially passed the requirement for this test subject, especially if we consider the NCLEX system and the Supreme Court's handling of the 2003 scandal-rocked bar exams. Baka magkahiyaan pag nakarating ang isyung ito sa Supreme Court. Saka, hindi ba being bureaucratic lang ang hindi makakita ng validity ng Test 3 under the circumstances?

The PRC exam tests the examinees’ ability to pass at least 75% of whatever number of questions is given. If this is applied to Test 3 exclusive of leakage, the examinees should pass 75% of the 80 questions. However, because there are remaining 80 valid questions out of the total 100 questions for Test 3, it is still mathematically possible that there are legitimate and valid passers in Test 3 who will be jeopardized by the subjective and mindless order to retake Test 3—those who got at least 75 correct answers out of the 80 valid questions, which 75 correct answers still meet the required 75% not of the 80 remaining valid questions but of the original 100 questions for Test 3!!! Thus concluding that Test 3 needs retake is NOT ABSOLUTELY CORRECT and violates the rights of those who may have gotten at least 75 correct answers in that test, GET IT??? O where art thou, bakit hindi kayo kumikibo, mathematicians from UP, UE, and UST!!!! Bakit hinayaan ninyong magbigay sa Presidente ng hindi foolproof na recommendation on Test 3 ang mga retake proponents na hindi naman mathematicians???

Sa gobyerno, daming napakalaking KAWALANGHIYAAN ang ginawa ng maraming matatanda na (gaya ni Jocjoc Bolante, Gen. Garcia, etc.?), pero ang Malacanang, ang LUWAG sa kanila--walang ginawang vigorous pursuit of the cases against them, bakit sa mga 17,000 kabataang nursing passers, ang HIGPIT ng Malacanang?

O kaya si Gng. Imelda Marcos, bakit hindi nag-exert ng all-out effort ang Malacanang na ipakulong siya, and once she is in jail, that is the time to talk of compromise settlement on hidden wealth (assuming compromise is to be tried at all)--meaning NEGOTIATE from a POSITION OF STRENGTH, hindi yung parang si ABCEDE pa ang nanunuyo sa kanya. Kaya ba ayaw habulin si Imelda ay nanunuyo ang Malacanang dahil may clout pa rin siya at mga anak niya sa voters sa Ilocandia at sa Visayas? Kala nyo hindi rin namin alam, he, he, he!

The 2006 nursing scandal should not be taken in ISOLATION. It has to be related to what was done in the past, in the 2003 bar exam scandal, in the 1996 physical theraphy exam scandal, in the kid-glove treatment of suspected plunderers of the nation, and of murderers and kidnappers whose death penalty has been abolished, and so on. Being so EASY on them and so HARD on the 2006 passers is unfair and unjust to the latter. And please don't tell them that it is for their own good. Pure speculation lang yung sinasabing kasiraan nila. Iyon ay direct result lang ng paninira sa kanila, kaya na-conditioned tuloy ang minds ng public. Siyempre kung ano ang laging sinasabi tungkol dito, lalo na ng ABS-CBN at Manila Times, ay iyon ang magiging impression ng lahat. LIES repeated often enough will appear as TRUTH. But it is a fact of life that employers do not totally rely on PRC license, they also consider the transcript of record and the fact that the applicant is a nursing graduate--this is exactly what NCLEX is doing (it asks for diploma and transcript of record)--and it is the final nursing licensure exam process in the United States--eh bakit ayaw sabihin na incompetent din ang passers nito! May challenge na sa Pinoy BSN for Dr. Dante Ang and other retake apostles to denounce the very few questions in NCLEX exams for the sake of sick OFW’s and other Filipino patients in US hospitals, so let them heed the challenge kung talagang hindi sila believe sa remaining 80 questions ng Test 3 for one subject vs. first 60 graded questions in NCLEX for all subjects!!! Let them show to the President and to other cabinet officials present during the meeting in Malacanang their conviction of the validity of their retake advocacy by denouncing before the world the established NCLEX exam system with very few questions (75 to 265) compared to that of the 500-question PRC exams. (In the NCLEX exam, if the examinee passes the 60 graded questions out of the first 75 questions, he is automatically declared PASSED and the computerized checking of answers stops, otherwise he is given a second chance and the checking of answers proceeds up to the last and 265th question. If he passes the remaining questions, the examinee passes the exam.)

Kaya siguro dapat ay paratingin ang kasong ito hindi lang sa Court of Appeals kung hindi hanggang sa Supreme Court.

Saka, hindi ba't sinabi na ng maraming government officials, pati ng Presidente, pati ni DOJ Secretary Raul Gonzales sa TV, etc. noong una pa na PUNISH THE GUILTY and SPARE THE INNOCENT, ano na ang nangyari sa pronouncement na ito?

Bakit yung mga inosenteng passers sa Mindanao at iba pang lugar na malayo sa cheating ay kasali rin, kung 42,000 ang magre-retake? TALAGA PO BANG ANG PINAKAMATAAS NA OFFICIALS NG BANSA AY WALANG ISANG SALITA? Paano na maniniwala ang taong bayan sa kanila? Kaya tuloy yung sinasabi nila sa Cha-cha, maraming hindi believe--kaya hintayin na lang ang plebiscite kahit ito ay gastos lang.

Kung ganyan din lang ang usapan, baka mabuti ay protect na rin ang integrity and image hindi lang ng nursing profession kung hindi ng buong bansa before the world. REMOVE THE DOUBT OF CHEATING IN THE LAST NATIONAL ELECTIONS--BECAUSE THAT DOUBT IS REAL, AS ELOQUENTLY EXPRESSED BY THE ONGOING APPEAL BEFORE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL OF MS. LOREN LEGARDA IN THE PURSUIT OF WHICH SHE SPENDS MILLIONS IN PESOS, AND THE SUPPRESSED GARCI TAPES AND THE MAYUGA REPORT AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE--KAYA DAPAT AY REELECTION NA RIN NG PRESIDENTE AT IBA PA!!!!

In short, ang sagot sa RETAKE: REELECTIONNNNN!!!!

Posted by Anonymous | 2:42 AM

have you heard, guys the rumors going around... mr. ang has a girlfriend who took NLE & failed last June...he wanted to take over PRC so probably he can provide this gf w/ leakage... ang sama! so how can they be sure na leakage proof nga ang susunod na NLE... e ang UST may history din yan nagbibigay ng leakage sa mga students nila...

Posted by Anonymous | 11:48 AM

PABAGSAKIN! PABAGSAKIN SI GLORIA!!!!

ISAMA MO NA RIN UST SA PAGBAGSAK MO!!!!

Posted by Anonymous | 2:26 PM

ok, cge retake.. pero with these following conditions:

1. retake of test 3 and 5 only
2. airconditioned testing centers
3. exam results will be out in not more than 1 week

4. all expenses will be shouldered by the government

5. on the day of registration, the prc will be open exclusive for the registration of nurses only, no other professions will be allowed (hehe selfish)

6. the retake of the exam should be scheduled earlier, probably middle of November

7. all nurses who passed the retake should have their licenses at hand before Christmas of 2006

8. ano pa ba? wala na ako maisip eh..

Posted by Anonymous | 5:48 PM

what about previous board exams with alleged leakages, will they retake?

what about previous presidential election with alleged cheating, will she retake/re-elect?

Dante Ang is claiming perception of imcompetence, can he tell his BOSS GMA about the perception of the world regarding her legitimacy?

this press release is biased becuse dante ang owns manila times

Posted by Anonymous | 9:00 AM

sus! nagmalaki pa ang UST, darating ang araw lalagapak din kau at tatalunin kayo ng ibang skuls.

Posted by Anonymous | 10:09 PM

KABULOKAN...

Posted by Anonymous | 1:30 PM

Badtrip tlg mga tga UST.. one of our reviewer is fr. ust and boy!!!! grabe xa sa kayabangan!!! di namin xa pinapasukan!! leche xa!! oh.... depensa!!!!!!

Posted by Anonymous | 10:13 AM