It has to go in a custom footer (not html module) to work*. The source, which also has some interesting thoughts on the desirability of disabling right click, is below: http://javascript.about.com/library/blnoright.htm *Using in a custom footer:replace all code in xslt box with this: ]]>

« Home | 85 ITEMS - Nursing Practice (Basic Health Care Pro... » | Review centers told to seek school tie-up or close... » | Nursing schools get ultimatum » | Acute nursing shortage hits hospitals » | Labor chief questions oath-taking of nurse-flunker... » | 99 who took nurses exam in WV covered by selective... » | R&A Seeks Additional Visas for RN and PTs » | A retake would have been wiser » | New nursing board needs briefing, says labor chief... » | COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING EXAMINATION PART I Answer... »


QUICKLINKS : CHAT RULES / PINOYBSN FORUM

Review centers’ purge begins

Review centers’ purge begins

By Florante S. Solmerin

THE Commission on Higher Education yesterday said it would close down erring review centers starting November next year.

In memorandum Order 49 dated Nov. 3, Ched gave review centers a grace period of one year to meet the requirements. A nursing review center, for instance, has to have its own nursing school or has a tieup with one.

CHED Chairman Carlito Puno said his agency has asked the Department of Trade and Industry not to accept new applications for review centers in the country following the approval of the memorandum containing the rules and regulation for Executive Order 556 which regulates operation of review centers.

The memorandum also provides an alternative to the existing review centers that fail to meet standards.

“Failure of existing review centers to fully comply with the above shall bar them from existing as review centers and they shall be deemed as operating illegally as such,” the memorandum read.

Review centers covered by the memorandum are those that “offer to the public and/or to specialized groups whether for a fee or for free academic program intended to refresh and enhance the knowledge or competencies and skills requiring licensure examinations.”

Continue reading on: http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/?page=politics6_nov15_2006

bakit ang review center lang ang na reregulate and in a way pinaparusa, why is it nothing is ever mentioned about the PRC, sa kanila nag-originate ang leakage, and definitely hinde lang ang dalawang BON ang involve doon...what happen to responde superior, or the chain of command, si rosero ang daming kapalpakan on her handling the leakage, bakit parang wala lang....

KASI NAMAN AS FAR AS THE PRC IS CONCERNED WALANG LEAK SA KANILA... IT WAS NOT EVEN A LEAK KASI DI GALING SA OFFICE NILA ANG QUESTIONS. THE TEST QUESTIONS WERE SECURED AS FAR AS THE PRC WAS CONCERNED...

ANG MAY KASALANAN AY YUNG 2 BON MEMBERS NA NAGRELEASE NG QUESTIONS NILA BEFORE THE EXAMS NA DAPAT MAY NON-DISCLOSURE CONTRACT SILANG PANANAGUTAN. TAPOS ITO NAMANG REVIEW CENTERS NA INSTEAD OF HELPING THE PROFESSION CAPITALIZED ON IT. MATAGAL NA NAGYAYARI ANG MGA BENTAHAN NG BOARD QUESTIONS NA YAN... LET'S FACE IT... NAKIKINABANG RIN ANG MGA YAN FOR YEARS AND YEARS NA.

DI MO RIN NAMAN MAIPAGKAILA ANG POSITION NG PRC WITH ALL THE PROFESSION THAT IT REGULATES. IT HAS TO UPHOLD ITS NAME. IF THERE REALLY WAS A LEAK FROM THE PRC DI LANG NURSING ANG MAWAWALAN NG INTEGRITY KUNDI ALL PROFESSIONS UNDER IT. MASMALAKING KAWALAN YON.

AS FAR AS ROSERO IS CONCERNED... SO FAR NAPAHIYA NA SIYA NUNG NILAGAY UNDER DOLE ANG PRC. AS FOR CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE OR WHATEVER... WALA KASI EBIDENSYA NA NAGKULANG SYA... SUMOMBRA NGA... ABUSE OF DISCRETION NGA E... PERO NI-RECTIFY NA NG COURT...

AS FAR AS SC IS CONCERNED THE PRO-RETAKE PEOPLE HAVE TO PROVE THAT DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE TO THEM BY THE EXAMINEES. SO FAR WALA. KAHIT MENTAL ANGIUSH. EMOTIONAL DAMAGE. OR FINANCIAL.. MAS-MAY GROUNDS PA NGA ANG CASE NG MGA TAONG NAG-FILE NG DAMAGES KAY TADLE ET AL KAYSA SA MAG-RETAKE E... NAPAHIYA NA SILA, NAHIRAPAN NA PAMILYA NILA, DI PA SILA KAAGAD NAKAHANAP NG WORK.... KAHIT SABIHIN NILA NASIRA IMAHE NG NURSING... DI PA RIN KASALANAN YUN NG EXAMINEES.

posted 9:47 PM:

its not RESPONDE SUPERIOR....but RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR!

So are you saying that ang BON is a comission under a commission, simply put walang nag-ooversee sa mga ginagawa nila, saan galing yan idea na yan.... at kung walang authority si rosero or yun PRC over the BON, why is it that rosero was really trying to cover up the leakage, she did everything illegal and stupid just to cover it up, like nag-acknowledge na nga siya na meron talagang leakage, yet she still published the result, so that she would have people to really with her @ mga presumed passer... she also acknowledge that leaks happens all the time not only in nursing but also in other profession, so bakit wala naman siya or sila ginawagaw about it... dont you think it because they are part of it...paranaoid pa thinking ko... o naive ka lang... nag-kulang siya dahil she is not doing anything to secured that these leakage will be minimize, sumobra siya because she abused her power to publishing the result kahit alam niya na may leakage..and allowing or making the recomputation of the grades....and sa pakatao ni rosero i dont think na pahiya siya noon nilagay ang PRC under the dept. of labor the way she handle the leakage situation does not show a trace of a person who is capable of shame, parang gloria din siya, addicted din sa power or the money that they can make from that power.

hay naku... rosero may have the authority pero hindi siya super hero... di sya tulad ni jean grey na nung tinanong niya mga BON members kung may leak ba talaga and todo deny sila lahat ay nabasa nya ang mga iniisip nina dionisio at madeja..... and in the first place di siya konsensya ng lahat ng board ng lahat ng propesyon. ano yung BON? toddlers? preschoolers?... matatakot kay nanay rosero?

kayo na nga lang magPRC chair at tingnan natin kung kaya nyong magregulate para sa lahat ng propesyon... reklamo ng reklamo kala nyo kung sinong magaling. judge ng judge kala nyo naman sinong malinis. eto namang si brion may pa-report report pa eh ang sample naman nya is 400 examinees lang out of the 42000. tapos almost half lang nun ang may aberration sa grades... sana nag-ala prc na lang siya at kumuha ng statistician para naman masmay weight ang kanya report at di lang siya magmukhang nabato nung sinabi ni rosero na pampagulo lang siya sa trabaho ng prc.

correction poster 2:23, 400 out of 1K plus that failed but passed because of C.A decision. we all know that rosero is not very good in terms of handling a situation. so pls stop defending her. nakakairita lang.

siguro sobrang talino ni rosero kaya nakalimtan magisip ng tama! u dont have to be smart to know what is right for the examinee. like the nclex said, if they found out that there's a leakage. automatic retake. dont tell me na masmagaling si rosero compare kay fields! the PRC should be the one to blame on wat is happening right now. i cant understand why the ann didnt include the prc in their case.

simple, tuta ni rosero ang ANN. Naggagamitan lang sila, unfortunately, mukang mas nakinabang si rosero!!!! Wawa lang ANN, used and abused!

SUE Rosero!

Post a Comment


PBSN Forum


Photobucket 

- Video and Image Hosting

Archives

Links