Appeals court lets nurses take oath
Appeals court lets nurses take oath
By Jomar Canlas, Reporter
THE Court of Appeals said on Thursday that the 17,000 who passed the nursing board exam and who were on the original list of passers issued by the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) could take their oath as soon as possible.
During mediation proceedings held by the court, Associate Justice Vicente Veloso, who wrote the ruling, asked the PRC and the Department of Labor and Employment to consider the court’s ruling of October 13 as “immediately executory.”
The PRC said it would conduct the oath-taking on Friday or Monday.
By Jomar Canlas, Reporter
THE Court of Appeals said on Thursday that the 17,000 who passed the nursing board exam and who were on the original list of passers issued by the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) could take their oath as soon as possible.
During mediation proceedings held by the court, Associate Justice Vicente Veloso, who wrote the ruling, asked the PRC and the Department of Labor and Employment to consider the court’s ruling of October 13 as “immediately executory.”
The PRC said it would conduct the oath-taking on Friday or Monday.
Veloso questioned why the oath-taking of the 17,000 nursing board passers who make up 41.24 percent of the original list was being held up.
The court said that the ruling would be considered implemented since the temporary restraining order stopping the oath-taking had lapsed.
Veloso said the PRC was an independent body that has the authority to implement the oath-taking.
“…To take an oath is an individual right. No one can stop the oath-taking,” Veloso said.
He required the PRC to provide the court with the list of the additional passers who should be allowed to take their oath.
In the meantime, the main petitioner to the case will question Veloso’s opinion that the court’s ruling is immediately executory.
Pia Bersamin, lawyer for the petitioner UST College of Nursing, said they still have a motion for reconsideration pending with the court’s First Division. She said it was not a conciliation at all, because they do not agree with Veloso’s view.
Bersamin said that if needed, they will challenge the declaration of Veloso before the Supreme Court.
“We are open to all options including the Supreme Court to stop the oath-taking. The case before the Court of Appeals is not yet final and executory, because there is still a pending motion for reconsideration,” Bersamin said.
continue reading on:
continue reading on:
“…To take an oath is an individual right. No one can stop the oath-taking,” Veloso said.
NO ONE except BRION?!
I wonder how the Secretary of Labor interpreted the CA ruling! Where and how did he arrived at 15 days before the CA ruling become executory after 60 days of TRO?
This was the reason why I was asking for anyone who might have the complete copy of the CA directive.
Looks like Atty. Saguisag was correct, that Mr. Brion should be held in contempt.. He is just prolonging the agony of the board passers and their families on one hand, and appealing for sobriety on the other hand.
The June 2006 Board Passers have every right to their licenses, more so with their much delayed (on&off) oath taking!
Mother of a Board Passer from Dagupan City
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:30 AM
Gago, pag-oath-in mo na sila lahat. Pati na si Renato Aquino na 75 flat ang average pero di kasama sa 1687.
Inabandona na ng ANN-ANN ang 1687. Dapat kasama ka doon toto sa totoo lang.
nagreview ka pa Pentagon, di ba?
Posted by
Anonymous |
8:08 AM
808 poster:
1. Haven't you noticed how the ANN, Toto in particular became the spokesperson / buffer for the PRC and BON? Kalimutan yata nila na BON PRC ang puno at dulo nito. Rosero is just laughing all the way . . . .
2. Kanya kanya na 'to, nilaglag na nila mga retakers, saving your skin, to each his own . . . so much for protecting the "passers'" right, so much for justice, pwehhh.
3. Can't imagine why Ann hold rosero in high regard, palpak din naman.
Malas lang nakasama sa mga retake!!!! Goodluck to all just the same. Just glad its over for most of you!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
8:19 AM
Ano magagawa ng ANN eh kung bagsak talaga ang 1687?
They did not cheat but they did not pass either.
Ang 1687 pumasa lang dahil sa recomputation.
Kung iisipin nga eh dapat retake lahat from 1-5 ang 1687 kasi di sila bagsak sa isa or dalawang subject lang kundi sa general average mismo.
At least they are allowed to retake 2 subjects instead of all 1-5.
AWAYIN NYO ANG UST GROUP NA NAGPETITION I-VOID ANG RESOLUTION 31 AND CA NA NAG-RULE NA VOID NGA YUN.
Posted by
Anonymous |
8:25 AM
dun yata sa 1687,nag petition na ng prc pra mareconsider yung 1687 sa passers...sana maging considerate ang CA pra hapi n lahat! pwede namn kc tlagang gawin ng prc yung resolution 31.
godbless
Posted by
Anonymous |
11:10 AM
Is ANN still interested go after the cheaters? Even the bloggers here admit that there is indeed leakage in Gapuz!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
11:17 AM
Pero sagutin pa rin ito dapat:
1. Ano ang average ni kasaang Toto?
2. Saan siya nagreview?
3. Ano ang masasabi niya sa pandaraya?
4. Bakit niya ginagamit ang ANN members na magvolunteer sa PRC?
Ako nagvolunteer din minsan.
5. Bakit niya pinabayaan ang 1687?
Just asking.
Posted by
Anonymous |
1:11 PM
I fought for all of us with Toto & Grace, but we cannot win them all. It's just sad to hear the comments above as if we have done nothing for our cause. Maybe it's that kind of attitude & reasoning that you have on why you belong to those who failed. You simply cannot comprehend. Please use the nursing process & start by gathering FACTS before making your analysis. Your questions & doubts only proves you have made your diagnosis of the situation without FACTS at hand.
In layman's terms, you FAILED, fair & square & there's nothing even the best attorney can do for you. YOU are LUCKY enough to be given a chance to RETAKE w/o paying for it.
Do you have any suggestion how to defend your case? If you do, then do it!
Still, we are trying to make the court understand that it has been the practice of PRC to to provide a buffer since time immemorialin all professions under PRC.
If you think you don't deserve to RETAKE, then STAND UP & Fight for your right instead of badmouthing people on this forum!
What have you done to fight for your right? I'm very sure... None!
Posted by
Anonymous |
3:17 PM
Poster 3:17
Tumpak ka Chong sa sinabi mo, we can't win it all! Kung puede lang sana isama na rin yong 1,687 sa oath taking kaso hindi nga puede sabi ng CA kaya huwag ninyong i blame kay Toto ang sinapit ninyo kasi even kung 75 flat lang ang grade nya sa recomputation sa PRC, hindi ho malayong tataas average niya nong ni null and void ng CA yong Resolution 31 kasi 90 questions yong dapat i consider sa Psychia and if you made good at it tataas average mo talaga. But even if the 20Q and 90Q sa Test 3 and 5 were considered pero mali naman sagot mo, hihilain ka non pababa kaya yong nasama sa 1,687 chances are hindi maganda result ninyo sa Psychia and you just fared satisfactorily on test 1,2 and 4. Pls. don't blame anybody but yourselves, kasi you were the ones who made your grades not Toto. I only have one question for you, mahirap ba talaga intindihin yong nangyari sa inyo kasi kahit anong paliwanag sa inyo dito sa mga bloggers hindi pa rin ninyo makuha eh, at kung sino-sino na blame ninyo, hindi man lang ninyo inisip na baka kayo yong may problema, projection yata yong tawag ng defense mechanism na yan, at yan ay ginagamit ng mga Paranoid. Hindi ako ang nagsabi nyan ha, nasa libro yan, nabasa ko lang! Merry Christmas to all and to God be the Glory indeed! Mabuhay lahat ang June 2006 NLE passers!
Posted by
Anonymous |
5:11 PM
kelangan ba sisihin si tot.. anu bayan parang bata.sisihin.
wla naman magagawa un tao kung un ang ruling ng CA. makipagargue kau dun.madame kaya natulong si toto stin. eh anu kung flat 75.uyyyyyy, madame flat 75 ah. grabe bitter na bitter. kung ngreview man sya sa pentagon, prob n nya un db? sbi naman ng CA sila bhala mgtrace sa mga ngreview s 3 review center.
Posted by
Anonymous |
12:59 AM
Actually malaki ang pagkakamali dito ng PRC by not informing those 1687 noon pa man na hindi sila pumasa, but by mean of re-computation ay napasa sila.
Sana bago nila ipinasa 1687 ay sinabihan muna sila ng PRC na hindi talaga sila pasado noon pa man kaya nga lang ipinasa sila sa pamamagitan re-computation. Para ano't ano man ang mangyari tulad nga nito na binagsak sila ay hindi sila masasaktan dahil alam na nila noon pa man na bagsak talaga sila pero ang masakit ay ngayon lang nila nalaman na bagsak sila at hindi pala sila pasado, para tuloy nakapag-dududa.
Dito ang pagkakamali ay nasa panig na ng PRC at CA rulings. Dahil dito dapat ipasa na lang sila kasi pinaasa na rin sila na pasado sila at malaking kahihiyan na rin sa mga nakakaalam na pasado sila then bagsak pala sila.
Kung hindi sila ipapasa ay dapat humnigi sila ng moral damages between PRC and Court of Appeals dahil sa pangyayari....
Pero dapat ipasa na sila kasi pinaasa na sila at masyadong mababa na ang kanilang moral at I'm sure they will not make it for retake kasi mababa na ang moral nila kasi para silang napag-iwanan ng mga nakapasa na at dito napakasakit talaga para sa kanila at kanilang mga mahal sa buhay!!!!
Parang nanalo ka sa beauty contest then after all the praises and beautiful acknowledgement, sasabihin sa iyo na "sorry hindi pala ikaw ang nanalo" pasensya ka na lang.
Malaking INSULTO ITO!!!!!!
Posted by
Anonymous |
1:10 PM
see,,,, bakit ngayon na may lumabs na meron palang 1687 na addtional passers, some one says,
"Actually malaki ang pagkakamali dito ng PRC by not informing those 1687 noon pa man na hindi sila pumasa, but by mean of re-computation ay napasa sila.
Sana bago nila ipinasa 1687 ay sinabihan muna sila ng PRC na hindi talaga sila pasado noon pa man kaya nga lang ipinasa sila sa pamamagitan re-computation. Para ano't ano man ang mangyari tulad nga nito na binagsak sila ay hindi sila masasaktan dahil alam na nila noon pa man na bagsak talaga sila pero ang masakit ay ngayon lang nila nalaman na bagsak sila at hindi pala sila pasado, para tuloy nakapag-dududa.
Dito ang pagkakamali ay nasa panig na ng PRC at CA rulings. Dahil dito dapat ipasa na lang sila kasi pinaasa na rin sila na pasado sila at malaking kahihiyan na rin sa mga nakakaalam na pasado sila then bagsak pala sila."
boggers on this site earlier fought that PRC-BOn is walang kasalanan...hmmm...save my skin n nga
Posted by
Anonymous |
10:18 PM